How Disney and Warner Bros. Are Causing Internet Piracy to Boom | Platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ were supposed to do away with pirated media. Instead, they may make them stronger than ever.::Platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+ were supposed to do away with pirated media. Instead, they may make them stronger than ever.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    All of these media companies splitting everything up and making it nearly impossible to figure out which service is hosting what shows is what did this. They got greedy and raised their prices.

    So naturally people are going to be inclined to figure out how to safely pirate things and then they’re going to do it.

    You should never pirate things, that would be immoral to use mullvad and qbittorrent to pirate things!

    Movies (7) and (9) anime are very expensive to make! You’re stealing from corporate executives when you pirate!

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Netflix did stop me from pirating for several years until it went to shit. Once the other companies started rolling out their own streaming services and pulling their content off Netflix I went back to piracy. It’s way easier to manage one VPN subscription than try to keep track of a bunch of streaming services.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am still convinced that they eventually give up and license their content back to Netflix for a nice passive income. We’ll get back to those days.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still have more subs for these than I would like, but I generally download anything I actually want to watch anyway. Like, the fact that justwatch.com even exists is an indictment of the way this works.

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Forget streaming, physical media is ripe for hoarding right now. Thrift stores, antique malls, junk stores, etc can’t give this stuff away. Even 4k blurays on amazon are deeply discounted right now.

    • Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Services like these combatted convenience not price. It just happened that prices were able to be low whilst these companies could afford it.

      Unfortunately due to greed and rising energy costs (but let’s face it, it’s greed) prices are rising which makes convenience matter less.

      And to add to that, having multiple streaming services isn’t convenient. Again, this is caused by greed.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    People with MBAs can’t fucking help themselves. They got a goose that lays golden eggs, but it doesn’t lay those golden eggs fast enough, so without even taking off their wristwatch they reach right up the poor bird’s cloaca, grab the first thing that feels vaguely round and pull as hard as they can. So then they have a half inside out goose and no more golden eggs ever again.

    People pay for a Master’s degree to learn how to do this.

    Reminds me of a passage in Ben Rich’s autobiography. Ben Rich spent his career at the Lockeed Skunkworks, started off designing a heater for the relief tube of jet fighters so the pilot’s penis wouldn’t freeze to the side of the tube while taking a piss, ended up running the team that designed the F-117. While he was second in command, his boss sent him to Harvard’s Business School, who ran a time crunched program for adults who are already in careers and “need” additional business schooling. Upon his return, his boss asked him what he learned. And he wrote on the chalkboard “2/3 HBS = BS”

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It has less to to with people having MBAs and much more to do with companies having shareholders. Once you’re a publicly traded company there are overwhelmingly strong external forces that compell companies to increase revenue. Even if the business model is perfectly solid and it doesn’t make sense to expect rising profits the shareholders only care about growth rates. On the stock market a companies value is only dependent on its growth.

      Take Netflix for example. They’ve had so many users some years ago when they were basically the only streaming service that one might have said they reached market saturation. That would’ve been a money making machine that people could be content with. But since the market always needs growth it isn’t enough and netflix is always trying to “innovate” or squeezie more monthly payments from the existing customer base.

      cory doctorow has coined the great word “enshittification” to describe this process. And its driven by the need to grow further even though its to the detriment of the service or the customers. In the end it’s the people with the MBAs doing it. But if they’re not doing it the shareholders replace them with those that do.

      • ChanchoManco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Two thirds of HBS is BS, I guess it’s saying it literally and playing that HBS has 3 letters and BS 2

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Markets are greedy and never satisfied. A fracturing of services has led to situation where it’s impossible for the average person to be able to afford all the streaming services they need in order to watch their stuff. And even if they could, they now have to pay extra to exclude adverts - the lack of which was a major selling point for streaming services. Pay extra to watch in high quality and no matter what service you use and what content you’ve bought - music, TV, books, movies. games - it’s all stuffed full of DRM that can literally remove the media from your devices. You don’t even really own the stuff you’ve bought.

    So yeah, I fully appreciate why some people pirate stuff.

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I never subscribed to streaming services.

    I always used free streaming sites like fmovies or downloaded stuff I really liked.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    My biggest question is despite how expensive Disney+ is and their huge subscriber base, how are they not profitable? Nebula is a fraction of the price without any ads and plenty of originals and is quite profitable despite having under 1 million subs.

    • krakenx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They spent $350 million making Secret Invasion, which was a bad show in every way. They have no control over their costs, yet they squeeze everyone as hard as they can.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Power to the pirates, the only ones making all content accessible to everyone.

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    When it was just Netflix and Hulu, it was great for consumers because having a couple streaming services could easily replace the need for cable TV for most people (unless you wanted to watch live sports) and the entertainment companies could still profit from licensing their content to the streaming services. But that wasn’t enough for the entertainment companies, and they all thought they could get in on the streaming game with their own platforms, only to discover that keeping a streaming service running and keeping subscribers is expensive for both the company and the consumer, and consumers only have so much time and disposable income they can spend on those services. So the market has become oversaturated with a million streaming services all carrying limited libraries of content that make it tough for any consumer to feel it’s worth it to pay for any of them except when one or two certain shows on each have a new season. This leaves most services running at a loss after expenses of keeping servers up and trying to make content to bring in and keep those subscribers, which many fail to do. The current state of it is unsustainable and I think in the end it’s eventually going to return to a model where only a few will survive, probably the larger ones owned by the entertainment companies themselves who have deep enough pockets from their other ventures to keep their services alfoat during off-peak times. A LOT of content is going to become lost media as that purge of services happens.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Weird how an open source media streaming app works fine, but Disney can’t keep their app working on Android to save their lives.

    I assume bullshit DRM has something to do with it, but I wouldn’t know because there’s way easier (and even legal!) ways to get media onto my server than that.