at first I read that one header as “We’re Not Changing”

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      In theory, they can’t share ad targeting data. That said, with the DMA they should not be able to share “data to effectively make you able to complete tasks”, that’s the point. Interoperability between Gmail and YouTube should equal the interoperability between Gmail and Peertube or somesuch.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      EU, aka the illusion of changes to make good impression while catching 🤝US dollars at the EU parliment

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cool, so its either: do YOU want to use shared data across your accounts as well, or only us (google)?

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The loopholes are ridiculous, not to mention that they are obviously going to just break everything for you if you don’t comply anyway, but there’s so many things they could do to throw sand in the gears- what matters is that the EU is doing something, it’s reacting, it’s trying to fight it and keep our common European values and not let foreign corporate empires dictate how things are done here, futile as the prospect may seem.

  • neutron@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Does Google allow de-linking between accounts that were linked previously, then? I’ve seen people holding into a Google account just because it’s keeping hostage other accounts they actually care about.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The next thing we need to outlaw is this marketing bs.

    They are asking if you want to link services so they can share data. In the bottom bit they say they’re gonna share anyway for „other reasons“.

    Same as with banking services, I want to see how much money they will make from selling my data.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Things most certainly changed. Now google has to beg me for it. Come on Google, beg. But maybe your point is that resistance is futile and why even try to fight it just give in and let it happen. I don’t know but mama didn’t raise no quitter, I don’t know about you but to each his own eh.

    • zingo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      An efficient solution would to just stop using Google’s services all together. That way they can’t spy on you so easily and make a profile from your internet habits.

      There are plenty of alternatives to Google services in the opensource realm.

  • clever_banana@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Downvoted for picture of text. Please link to the page and transcribe it if you want to post a picture too. Blind people can’t read images of text.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Lemmy needs to add real alt-text functionality, putting in the body works, sure; but it’s not going to work out for posts that have both post text and images in the body. Such as someone posting text along with additional screenshots.

        Alt-text should be hidden visually, but readable by screen readers.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Huh. Would that be a good solution, like a hover popup you mean? I’m not into CSS. Will screen readers get that? Shouldn’t be crazy difficult to make a bot otherwise, screen reader scans images for text on request by poster or automatically. We have bots here right?

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            No. Basically just hidden/invisible text that only a screen reader would see.
            You’d just upload an image and type alt-text in a box, hit enter and the alt-text would be added to the HTML of the page but not rendered and the image would be added to the markdown as usual, when the screen reader gets to the image, instead of just skipping over it, it’d pull the hidden text from the HTML and read that.

            See HTML Accessibility.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Dude I’m just a drunk gal with an internet connection, you would not believe the things that slip my mind on a daily basis.

        I am always respectful and try to mind, but I’m not exactly omniscient either, I can barely hold my life together know what I mean? So sorry for no subtitles, but there are tons of super cool people here who do it voluntarily so that everyone can enjoy the knowledge of how deeply we are being spied on by Google. And our fight against it!

        • It’s not an indictment of you, it’s an indictment of Lemmy. AP has alt-text in the format. AP clients - almost uniformly - have space for alt text whanever pictures are posted, and the best of the remind and encourage you to add alt text when you post pictures. Lemmy provides no facility for alt-text; for a platform developed in this century and largely populated by inclusive liberals, it’s a rather shocking omission.