From the article: “About a decade ago, Tesla rigged the dashboard readouts in its electric cars to provide “rosy” projections of how far owners can drive before needing to recharge, a source told Reuters. The automaker last year became so inundated with driving-range complaints that it created a special team to cancel owners’ service appointments.

  • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And no one was ever surprised, except for people stupid enough to buy anything from Muskmelon in the first place.

  • NerfHerder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t be the only one who read this and wondered what problems Teslas were causing to golf courses.

    • HollandJim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nah. The world’s burning; going back to build more fires ain’t the way.

      (Edited as I no can grammar)

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              US rural settlements were built on train lines before cars destroyed that.

              For most long range travel, trains are the solution.

                • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  PEVs are kind of a trap though.

                  ICE cars are not just problematic because of their emissions, they do much worse things with their infrastructure requirements. Roads and parking that can support everyone driving their car alone everywhere results in sprawl. That makes everyone not in a car have to get in a car as well, and also increases infrastructure costs for other services, since they have to service a much larger area.

                  Cars have their place, but in an ideal world, a regular family regardless of where they live shouldn’t need one. It’s not a personal mobility solution. Taxies and stuff make sense, everyone sitting in their own car doesn’t.

                  And this is not even counting that car accidents are a leading cause of fatalities because we give a licence to everyone with a pulse.

    • TheMage@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good for you. EVs have a place in most households for quick trips and short errands. But that’s it. They have a huge set of issues that the anti ICE car brigade don’t wish to discuss. Face it, batteries are not a viable way to power the vehicles we all rely on and enjoy driving. Maybe as a second vehicle, yes but forget some big takeover. It’s so stupid.

  • Toto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon pulling numbers (which happen to be what the markets want) out of thin site is nothing new. Delivery time of cyber truck? Price points?

    He, like jobs before him, has morphed from a brilliant engineer to ruthless marketer. And like jobs before him justifies it versus his internal stunted moral compass

    Appreciate him for fostering the electric car economy, admire his work ethic (space x), but hate the guy

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except he never was a brilliant engineer, he was fired for engineering incompetence at one point, and he’s been lying about having an engineering degree.