My point is: it’s not technically correct, it’s just plain correct. Plenty of people I know go for cycling tours of Europe, packing food and sleeping in tents. Some do two weeks hiking.
Travel is not only flying to the other end of the world and eating fancy food cooked for you by hired chefs… you can travel basically free if you adjust your expectations.
You can travel by hitchhiking (free), walking (free), cycling (one bike costs) or even by volunteering on a ship (you might even earn money). You can sleep in a tent or couchsurfing or on said ship.
Everybody immediately goes to restaurants, transcontinental flights and hotels, of course you need money for that, but that’s exactly not the point.
Walking, biking and couchsurfing is free. In most countries camping is free too.
It’s not travel in your (and to be honest, most people in the comments) preferred version. The OP never mentioned luxuries, or even comfort. The point is that if what you really want to travel, you most probably can, independent of your financial situation.
Nobody said it isn’t.
It is traveling and it doesn’t require lots of money.
ITT: but first class tickets and 5 star hotels cost money!!!
Basically no one understands the message.
Spanish Head of State looking nervously around the room right now…
Those that people around me do not approve:
What’s the tinfoil budget in your household?
I guess I’ll never know, then…
Does that include losses (1 AWACS, at least 5 F15)?
Also, shiny.
And no MMU, so basically impossible to implement real multi tasking.
Of course data is kept consistent, that’s ACID.
Looks like a job for Charlie Kirk
I remember ext2 to ext3. Journaling was all the rage!
The front didn’t even fall off, clearly just damaged.
But that’s not what the slave owners with wooden teeth would have wanted!
Comrade, think of your social credits! Don’t criticize the oppression oppression (that doesn’t exist!)