Both. But if you’re “arresting” a protester haven’t they become a defacto suspect? Or are they arresting protesters for other reasons?
All other law enforcment in america is maskless. Why would ICE need special protections from vigilate justice?
Yes I have. There are only videos of people asking for badge numbers without getting a response. There are none where a badge number is given.
My point was that we need to see their faces because they will not identify themselves. Thats a big problem if we ever pull ourselves out of this; they will attempt to rejoin society like nothing happdened after illegally brutalizing american citizens. We need to know who the traitors are.
Have you ever seen an example of an ICE agent sharing a badge number on video from this year?
This does not address my point at all. I agreed that your suggestion would not necessarily negatively impact the total throughput on your route.
My point was that your route does not exist in a vacuum and the utility of the open lane may not be obvious without having the same information available as the traffic engineers who designed the closure.
What you’re missing is that the “closing lane” is often designed to be utilized to prevent traffic from backing up into another traffic control device.
While you’re “matching speed” with the open lane that’s hardly moving- traffic has now backed up into an intersection and caused gridlock on cross streets for miles behind you.
So while “total throughput” on YOUR journey has remained the same you may be causing chaos to the roads around you.
Your best bet is to just assume the traffic engineers who designed the closure know better than you.
This is what always leads me back to arch. I can follow an outdated 12-step guide to installing the software in Debian or I can install it with one command from AUR.
Somebody died while driving on a dark road at night. There were no signs or barriers in front of the bridge. Google was warned many times about the deadly hazard.
I’m not saying the liability is all on Google but I think its reasonable to get litigious when someone dies due to obvious negligence. How does this seem frivolous to you?
Its cheaper for me to have TV + Internet than just internet.
According to the manual it is required to use both.
I’m interested in why the bar is so chewed up. Are they handing out fakes as well?
I saw that exploding-heads moved their instance to this platform so I assume it’s difficult to block objectional content.
Sure but we’d need an unedited clip from the streets to the jail cell to prove they weren’t provided that information. Plus how long after the arrest do they have?
Seizing people off the street without an arrest warrant or probable cause is already a clear-cut 4th amendment violation. What do you do with that?