• Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

      Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

      We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn’t mean everyone else will

        Then they should ask for clarification.

        Just because you understand them well enough today doesn’t mean you will tomorrow

        At which point you can ask for clarification.

        We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

        And part of “better” is having the perspective and desire to avoid pedantry where it’s not needed.

        • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re clearly not going to agree here. Plenty of people would rather be made aware of their mistakes and that’s no less valid than your point of view. Personally I would rather avoid potential misunderstandings than deal with them after the fact. I’m not the only one who feels that way.

        • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting choice given the way that’s been shifting slowly back to the more accurate form in the past however many years.

          If colloquial usage did trump all, irregardless would’ve been acknowledged as a correct word well before I was born. It may be the driving force but it’s hardly the only, or even constantly deciding, factor