simple@lemm.eecake to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Skyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square127linkfedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down14
arrow-up1624arrow-down1external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comsimple@lemm.eecake to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square127linkfedilink
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·1 年前I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 年前I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 年前Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
minus-squareGenius@lemmy.zipBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.