I am not comfortable that signal depends proprietary google library. However, I find that Molly lags significantly behind signal (around 1 to 2 weeks, so maybe not as significant as I thought), but I am just concerned that if there is a security fix in signal, molly will not be able to react as fast.

I am also quite frustrated with the general lack of communication from the signal team (for example the lack of communication regarding username). I doubt they will have the good will to help molly when there is a critical security fix.

It is frustrating that signal no longer seems like the gold standard for privacy any more; unfortunately, all my friends are on there (ironic, isn’t it…).

  • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    XMPP or Matrix. I’m on Matrix only because I have my family there and I was there before I knew of XMPP and at this point I can’t turn that boat.

    Signal was/is (idk if they still are) into crypto, they don’t let you run your own server or client, and they have a proprietary shim in place to combat spam (or so they say, it can’t be audited because it’s proprietary).

    I was all in on Signal until the above.

  • Pablo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For me Molly works but one can’t use Signal betas (obviously) and backups are currupted for me for months.

  • jabberati@social.anoxinon.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    @baseless_discourse The gold standard has always been XMPP. It’s the IETF Internet Standard for messaging, no walled gardens, ability to self-host, no phone numbers required and modern clients use the same end-to-end encryption protocol as Signal does.

    • ninchuka@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the same encryption, it’s based on the same double ratchet design that’s it