• Spiritgaming28@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Somebody coming across this and briefly checking out the context section could think this is just a regular old mass surveillance law, but when you look at the High Level Group advice EU is citing as a key source you’ll see the full image.

    The craziest thing is that when a German MEP Patrick Breyer asked the EU to release the names of the people who were a part of the so called High Level Group that wrote this proposal, they replied with a list with all names blacked out. Here is Patrick Breyer’s own blog post on the subject

    According to Edri ”The HLG has kept its work sessions closed, by strictly controlling which stakeholders got invited and effectively shutting down civil society participation.”. Very nice.

    You can read the full High Level Group proposal here.TL;DR

    they want to sanction unlicensed messaging apps, hosting services and websites that don’t spy on users (and impose criminal penalties)

    mandatory data retention, all your online activity must be tied to your identity

    end of privacy friendly VPN’s and other services

    cooperate with hardware manufacturers to ensure lawful access by design (backdoors for phones and computers)

    And much, much more. And this law isn’t aimed towards big companies, all communication service providers are explicitly in scope no matter how small or open source.

    A mass surveillance law being written by unknown lobbyists behind closed doors, demanding that the EU should monitor the internet more than Russia, being pushed by the EU commission. Should be the biggest news of the decade, but isn’t.

    Also, EU commission (Ursula, Virkkunen, Brunner as the key players) are using the same high level group as a key source in their ProtectEU plan, which is their strategy for 2029 and includes restricting encryption. Politico article on the subject

    • Matt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      cooperate with hardware manufacturers to ensure lawful access by design (backdoors for phones and computers)

      Won’t apply to me because I use Linux BTW.

      • Smee@poeng.link
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Why do you think they cooperate with hardware manufacturers instead of OS producers or infiltrating the FOSS community harder?

        I can’t wait for the first fully open source computer.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It doesn’t matter if we defeat this one. They’ll just try again and again and again until it sticks.

        • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 days ago

          Infection is a natural part of existence and the human organism has to fight against every infection, whether familiar or not. We’ll just to have to take our bodies’ example.

        • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          The way you defeat it, is a constitution that explicitly protect these rights and empowering a court that will strike down laws that violate those rights.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah about that: These laws get passed. They are enacted. People challenge them in court. The court strikes it down after a long time. Another slightly differently worded law with the same content gets passed and enacted. People challenge it in court…

            Or well, the Authoritarian scum just ignore the courts.

            What is needed is a strong resistance on every level. This needs to be brought to media attention, needs to be protested, the people behind it need to be public ousted, shamed and stripped from all power, the companies behind it need to be boycotted and sabotaged so they go out of business…

            Waiting for courts to deal with things does not cut it with authoritarians. They only understand collective power against them.

        • Auster@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Accepting defeat is the quickest way for that. Humanity dealt with much worse already, and though they seem to be trying to be as bad, the push against them from the common citizen and the more reasonable of their peers in power is making momentum to be lost quickly.

  • Spiritgaming28@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And if anyone needs to send an email to MEP from your country about how concerning this initiative is.

    We must talk about this and raise awareness.

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/full-list/all

    All elected MEP, download the pdf and search on your country name or party. (no alternative since there is no search functionnalities on that page sadly)

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do you have a nice copy pasta I can send?

      I also suggest people to post the list of email addresses they gather so we can paste that into our email clients: email1@email.com, email2@email.com, etc I’ve done this in previous battles against these authoritarian proposals and it makes it easier.

  • SilliusMaximus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we go 5 minutes without someone proposing a ridicilous law?!

    Can’t they focus on problems that actually matter?!

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Hitting you with one bad law after another is part of an intentional scheme to induce fatigue and get one by without the public noticing.

    • ArkimedesWasRight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is exactly what they are doing. Focusing on problems that actually matter TO THEM. The average person’s problem is not their problem.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Europol’s precog crime-prevention AI needs to be fed again, I see. I’m assuming this is “for the safety of our children” again.

  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Um… I’ve read the document, where does it say anything nefarious? All I can see is unifying requirements for metadata storage and time to live?

    As in - to what exactly should I object, where’s the hidden poison?