L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoLiving to 120 is becoming an imaginable prospectwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down129file-text
arrow-up1283arrow-down1external-linkLiving to 120 is becoming an imaginable prospectwww.economist.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square171fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSheik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down4·1 year agoBy properly taxing companies and rich individuals? Besides, those leaving to 120 would most likely be among the richest of us. Do they really need a pension at all?
minus-squareRobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s just not happening.
minus-squareJJROKCZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt should be though, we need to demand change rather than just saying “oh they’ll never do it” and giving up.
minus-squarehappyhippo@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSorry, but if one can dream of properly taxing companies and rich individuals, there’s plenty of other shit to fix with that money first. Making living until 120 sustainable is not on the list, or very, very low on it.
By properly taxing companies and rich individuals? Besides, those leaving to 120 would most likely be among the richest of us. Do they really need a pension at all?
That’s just not happening.
It should be though, we need to demand change rather than just saying “oh they’ll never do it” and giving up.
Sorry, but if one can dream of properly taxing companies and rich individuals, there’s plenty of other shit to fix with that money first.
Making living until 120 sustainable is not on the list, or very, very low on it.