One chestnut from my history in lottery game development:

While our security staff was incredibly tight and did a generally good job, oftentimes levels of paranoia were off the charts.

Once they went around hot gluing shut all of the “unnecessary” USB ports in our PCs under the premise of mitigating data theft via thumb drive, while ignoring that we were all Internet-connected and VPNs are a thing, also that every machine had a RW optical drive.

  • TechyDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    ZScaler. It’s supposedly a security tool meant to keep me from going to bad websites. The problem is that I’m a developer and the “bad website” definition is overly broad.

    For example, they’ve been threatening to block PHP.Net for being malicious in some way. (They refuse to say how.) Now, I know a lot of people like to joke about PHP, but if you need to develop with it, PHP.Net is a great resource to see what function does what. They’re planning on blocking the reference part as well as the software downloads.

    I’ve also been learning Spring Boot for development as it’s our standard tool. Except, I can’t build a new application. Why not? Doing so requires VSCode downloading some resources and - you guessed it - ZScaler blocks this!

    They’ve “increased security” so much that I can’t do my job unless ZScaler is temporarily disabled.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, zScaler breaks SSL. Every single piece of network traffic is open for them to read. Anyone who introduces zscaler should be fired and/or shot on sight. It’s garbage at best and extremely dangerous at worst.

      • G00d4y0u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Zscaler being the middleman is somewhat the point for security/IT teams using that feature.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it’s a horrible point. You’re opening up your entire external network traffic to a third party, whose infrastructure isn’t even deployed or controllable in any form by you.

          • G00d4y0u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The idea being that it’s similar to using other enterprise solutions, many of which do the same things now.

            Zscaler does have lesser settings too, at it’s most basic it can do split tunneling for internal services at an enterprise level and easy user management. Which is a huge plus.

            I’d also like to point out that the entire Internet is a third party you have no control over which you open your external traffic to everyday.

            The bigger deal would be the internal network, which is also a valid argument.

            • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d also like to point out that the entire Internet is a third party you have no control over which you open your external traffic to everyday.

              Not really. Proper TLS enables relatively secure E2E encryption, not perfect, but pretty good. Adding Zscaler means, that my entire outgoing traffic runs over one point. So one single incident in one single provider basically opens up all of my communication. And given that so many large orgs are customers of ZScaler, this company pretty much has a target on its back.

              Additionally: I’m in Germany. My Company does a lot of contracting and communication with local, state and federal entities, a large part of that is not super secret, but definitely not public either. And now suddenly an Amercian company, that is legally required to hand over all data to NSA, CIA, FBI, etc. has access to (again) all of my external communication. That’s a disaster. And quite possibly pretty illegal.

    • tslnox@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Zscaler was once blocking me from accessing the Cherwell ticket system, which made me unable to write a ticket that Zscaler blocked me access to Cherwell.

      Took me a while to get an IT guy to fix it without a ticket.

    • Dkiscoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh man our security team is trialing zscaler and netskope right now. I’ve been sitting in the meetings and it seems like it’s just cloud based global protect. GP was really solid so this worries me

    • lightnegative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has the same problem as any kind of TLS interception/ traffic monitoring tool.

      It just breaks everything and causes a lot of lost time and productivity firstly trying to configure everything to trust a new cert (plenty of apps refuse to use the system cert store) and secondly opening tickets with IT just to go to any useful site on the internet.

      Thankfully, at least in my case, it’s trivial to disable so it’s the first thing I do when my computer restarts.

      Security doesn’t seem to do any checks about what processes are actually running, so they think they’ve done a good job and I can continue to do my job

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been ages since I had to deal with the daily random road blocks of ZScaler, but I do think of it from time to time.

      Then I play Since U Been Gone by Kelly Clarkson.