• TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If the science ain’t coming from PBS, Veritasium, Kurzgesagt, Minute Physics or Sabine Hossenfelder, then it’s getting the skeptical side eye.

    Edit: someone ought to make a browser plugin that can vet science youtubers by way of user reporting like the ones that compare product reviews across multiple marketplaces and give them an A through F score.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even Kurzgesagt isn’t incredible with science. They’re better with philosophy and thought experiments. There’s a couple very in depth videos abt what they’ve said wrong in climate science videos for example, and also pulls apart their funding which indicates heavy influence from billionaires in their formative years which seemed to influence the climate videos in question. If I can find it later I’ll link it here

      Edit: the video in question: https://youtu.be/uCuy1DaQzWI?si=G5ubdRKHmCI3uWUO

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, Kurzgesagt is very entertaining, but it’s really more popular science and not really about accuracy. I remember in a recent black hole video they were going on about the infinitely small singularity, where any self respecting scientist will tell you that that’s probably not the physical reality.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I even feel this way about sabine and PBS Space Time sometimes just because of topic choice, but I definitely respect both and watch their channels a good bit. Sometimes I feel that they can give too much of an air of credibility about really fringe ideas/hypotheses in the scientific community because those are what will generate clicks. Not to say that they’re bad, but if you’re really into astrophysics, someone like AcollierAstro might be more up your alley.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I loved that Sabine didn’t make any snarky remarks when MOND was disproven, even though she seemed to be a great MOND supporter. I don’t mind if a scientist (or science reporter) is biased as long as they disclose their bias.

            And damn, for a minute I thought you knew someone I haven’t seen before. But I just never read her name. AcollierAstro is great, but sometimes her ranty repeating style is too much for my fragile brain.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s especially hard to vet them, since they usually have to do the stupid clickbaity titles and thumbnails if they want to be in any way successful. Took me a long time to finally watch Arvin Ash and Dr Becky. The latter has since become my favourite.