Scientists have to list all the sources they use. And they quickly get called out for doing mistakes in that regard and suffer a loss of trust in their work.

What would happen if everything politicians say or write had to contain sources?

Speeches are prepared anyway, so you have to publish all the sources of your speech right after you held it. Saying things differently than in the source would be illegal.

I think it would be quite interesting, and a completely different way to do politics.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It wouldn’t be much different. Really what politicians need are more staff with science literacy and social literacy.

    You see the failure of science in policing frequently where metrics get imposed that end up having bad results (there’s a fantastic reply all about comstat). You need people with social literacy who can make better appointments and navigate these situations.

    We could use better science literacy among media: writers, news anchors, etc.