• user8e8f87e@berlin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    @vettnerk I don’t like Mint, because it looks ugly and dated. (But it is good that there is this distribution for all the boomers out there).
    I don’t like arch, because what is the point, if you can use Fedora instead.
    I don’t like Ubuntu, but the hate against it is much worse than the distribution itself.

    • yum13241@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fedora and Arch are very different. That’s like saying openSUSE and Fedora are the same, even that’s not as extreme as your claim because they at least use the same package format.

      • user8e8f87e@berlin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @yum13241 I want a distribution with recent packages = Arch | Fedora
        I want a stable and polished distribution = Fedora

        I don’t care for the AUR as is not needed anymore in times of flatpak and distrobox.

        • yum13241@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want to use a separate package manager with dumb douche.fuck.shit names, that’s a problem for programs like crispy doom for example.

          Native packages ftw