• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I admire their dedication, but at the same time strongly disagree with asking people to pay money for a service, that’s fundamentally based on a hole in a reverse engineered protocol. They won’t win this

    • doc@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They’re doing more than riding on apples services for free. They had to build and run a notification relay server to make this work.

      Same thing that’s been in the news about Apple sharing info with police. The content of the messages are ETE encrypted but notifications of who is talking to who is not

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        My objection wouldn’t be that they didn’t put in enough effort, because it was clearly a lot, but that the service is a doomed idea.

      • 𝕽𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖙@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Same thing that’s been in the news about some sharing info with police. The comment of the messages are ete encrypted but notifications of who is talking to who is not

        Beeper Mini’s GCM server only handles a “new message waiting” trigger, it doesn’t contain any private data like who the message is from or its contents, just that a new message is available.

    • 𝕽𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖙@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m happy to pay to support them.

      If you’d rather not pay the Beeper Cloud service is free and all of the matrix bridges it uses are open source.

      The source code behind how Beeper Mini works is available as well but will require a client of some sort to be written since you can’t just use a matrix bridge and a matrix app.

      The guy who started Beeper also created the Pebble Watch and they have always maintained open source alternatives for their bridges.

      I’m just happy that a company with those ethics is the one to take up this fight against Apple, this could have been a $10/month app from a company who believes in closed source and pushing ads/tracking users’ data.

      Beeper is a good company that actually cares about privacy and security and that should be commended.

    • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You should look at american legal precedent surrounding reverse engineering. Legally speaking, it’s quite hopeful.

    • kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If the open source community could provide such a thing for free I think they would have done it already?

      But presumably they lack the ability, the motivation or both.

    • paulsmith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t mind paying $2 a month for Beeper. I’ve been using it for months to consolidate all of my messaging apps. It’s worth $2 a month for me. Beeper Mini is just iMessage, so I don’t know if it’s worth it for me. They said they’ll eventually move all of the other chat services over to Beeper Mini, at which point it will just be Beeper.