misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agoStarlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidieswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square190linkfedilinkarrow-up1494arrow-down111cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1483arrow-down1external-linkStarlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidieswww.theverge.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square190linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarekattenluik@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·3 years agoThat’s completely wrong, for the ISPs it usually isn’t worth achieving and is why the government should step in.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squarekattenluik@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·3 years agoAnd also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can’t go.
minus-squaregaael@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 years agoAnd we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
That’s completely wrong, for the ISPs it usually isn’t worth achieving and is why the government should step in.
deleted by creator
And also simply not necessary to have as many satellites as Starlink does needed to cover the ocean and the rare spots where wires can’t go.
And we really need that 4K UHD porn to load faster on the hole planet, including the oceans.
deleted by creator