• zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      What % of countries failed via communist policies vs countries that failed via libertarian policies? The top countries are liberal capitalist democracies. Anyone still simping for communism in 2023 is 9/10 times a brainlet child loser who lives in the west, never having suffered in a communist shithole, and decided to hang all their failures in life on being a victim of their country’s cApiTaListiC liBerAlisM. EDIT: tankie coping clowns (lemmy is full of them) downvote yet have nothing of substance to say zzzzzz

      • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Somehow personal failings never happened in communism? I am from a formerly communist nation. Capitalism has been a disaster.

        Communism is bad for the people who want money. Capitalism is bad for everyone except the person who wants to hoard money.

        • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If your country failed/is failing, it’s hard to hang it on capitalism when, again, all top countries are liberal capitalists. It’s more likely due to corruption/mismanagement than capitalism. And no matter how much it’s failing, it’s not failing at a soviet famine or great leap forward level is it?

          Communism is bad for the people who want money. Capitalism is bad for everyone except the person who wants to hoard money.

          this is just a cringe and childishly reductive statement that means nothing.

          • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Is liberal capitalism how you describe centuries of colonial rule in Asia, Africa and the subsequent wealth drains?

            Are you sure you’re not misattributing their success to capitalism and ignoring the centuries of colonial wealth that flowed to the EU nations? Whenever I mention this in a EU space or those with westerners I get heavily downvoted. It looks like Europe doesn’t want anyone to remember their Dark Ages through colonial periods.

            Europeans just don’t want that closet of skeletons to be opened.

            • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Are you sure you’re not misattributing their success to capitalism and ignoring the centuries of colonial wealth that flowed to the EU nations?

              Are you sure you’re not ignoring all of the countries that are dominating out there that didn’t participate in colonial shenanigans and were even victims of them? Are Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, New Zealand, Ireland, South Korea, Taiwan, etc… ex-colonialist powers currently benefiting from the past profits of exploiting others? Tankies like to pretend the West only prospers exclusively from colonialism yet conveniently forget that the communist shitholes they simp for participated in just as much or even worse colonialism than the West (see: Soviet Union). The truth is liberal capitalist democracies are just better. Yes, we should implement many socialist policies, and many of these countries do. But to pretend that communism is a better path is just braindead ignorant childish thinking.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You might have had a point if A. I was simping for communism rather than pointing out hypocrisy. B. Your typical liberal democracy is in line with what Libertarian political parties actually want. The US, and it’s various industrialists, have tried, over and over, to implement Libertarian party regimes and have never gotten it to work for a single city, let alone country.

        They all either rapidly fall apart as no major business, even ones that show interest in the project, want to operate in a system where there is so little to insure that contracts will be honored, among other issues. The others rapidly turn into police states where the company owners dictate literally every aspect of your life because they own everything. They then create a system where you are always in debt to the company to prevent you from packing up and leaving, when people get tired of it and start leaving. It doesn’t even have as good a track record as the Soviets.