• SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    Y’know, they were going crazy over the top implementing unnecessary features… Maybe they actually did have too many employees doing useless things, but they should’ve instead had those employees focus on performance instead

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You hit the nail on the head.

      I see this so many places - nobody asks “how big does this company need to be”? This is the problem with public companies - they are caught in an endless growth trap. Private businesses at least get to a point where a) growth has to happen sustainably because often there isn’t endless money available to invest and b) once you’ve got one private jet, as owners, do you really need another?

      Reddit was no different. Maybe it would have been better for us all if it was a much smaller team and just careful tendered like a garden that had filled its plot.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well yeah, but we both know they are behaving like a company heading for an attempted IPO.

          • Copernican@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            But that’s why I don’t think the private vs public company distinction is what matters. When it comes to private, there’s a whole class of private equity owned companies that some people won’t even consider working at because of the reputation their cost cutting and flip mentality is. It’s not a black and white private good public bad because only one has public share holders and exchanges.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      You think you could put “improved performance and fixed bugs” on the brochure but if it’s not something with ~A.I. then it’s not gonna help sales.

  • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Unity, Google, Discord. All within a day or two of each other.

    For every number of employees laid off, a VP level employee must be fired. Those employees didn’t hire themselves. Someone came up with the idea.

    If companies don’t do this they’re not attacking the root of the problem.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They coordinate to create a glut and push all their wages down. Computer touching wagies and so socially stunted they’ll never form effective union. If they did, they would jusy defect out of greed.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      For every number of employees laid off, a VP level employee must be fired.

      You’re expecting Morlocks to feast on each other, instead of feasting on the Eloi.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Bold of you to think that the VP level employees don’t get big raises in exchange for laying empoyees off.

      • Copernican@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think it’s an unfair and naive assumption to think VPs all keep their jobs. I’ve seen some pretty nasty game of thrones plays by executive leadership during layoffs due to consolidation of teams and remits. Someone might get a bonus that doesn’t deserve it, but someone is going to get let go at a high level (albeit with a generous severance not offered to the rest of the employees).

        Also, when new senior leadership comes in, it’s not uncommon for them to let heads roll at the leadership level to fill out the team with folks they know or trust. I’m not shedding a tear about where those folks will go on to find similar employment, but I think there’s a misconception about how safe those positions actually are.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I guess I’m jaded because I’ve seen far too many times where it’s the worker bees, the people who actually put the work in and get things done, getting the sharp end of the stick. I would be surprised if the 17% of employees Discord laid off actually included VPs.

          • Copernican@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I hear you. You are going to see a lot more worker bees than VPs laid off in part because there’s a lot more worker bees than VPs.

            per https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/discord-layoffs-citron-overhiring-gaming-18603308.php

            The notice, required when companies perform mass layoffs, said the employees would officially leave Discord on Feb. 2. Dozens of engineers are among the casualties, as are several trust and safety employees, product managers and data scientists, according to the notice.

            Depending on how the structure is laid out and what product areas were cut, I’m guessing up to the director level would be impacted.

  • Potfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Discord went the way of Skype, it’s just a bloated fustercluck now. I don’t use it often, just once a month or so to keep up with a group of old friends, and every time I fire it up it has a new update bringing features I don’t give a rats ass about.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because it locks you out from even seeing the mods and stuff if you don’t have an account. Old time forums were better.

  • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Small company: yeah, we hired too many people, need to let go of 170.

    People: such huge cuts, not touching them anymore

    Large company: we’re laying off the entire staff of pre-Elon Twitter worth of employees in this one department because they didn’t make us enough money.

    People: good, your product sucked anyways

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, I wouldn’t exactly call a company with 1000 employees “small”. It’s not the behemoth that something like Google is, but like… that’s a good chunk of people.

    • Daniel F.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I haven’t used Discord in a while so YMMV but I used to use WebCord and screen sharing worked pretty well IIRC. It uses an up-to-date Electron version which has better support for modern desktop Linux protocols. There are probably plenty of other alternative clients that just repackage the web app with better Linux support. There’s also gtkcord4 which is a native Gtk client, though definitely not as polished as the official client.

  • RandomStickman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Any alternative you would recommend? I’m mostly using it for video group call for dnd. Although convincing the group to change to yet another program would be the hardest part.

    • m_randall@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      As far as self hosted I’ve heard a lot about matrix but haven’t tried it. Maybe I’ll give it a shot this weekend.

      https://matrix.org/

      There’s also telegram, slack, etc if you want something else commercial.

      • Ebsku@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve convinced few of my friends to use Matrix and it has been a really nice platform and now I prefer it to Discord not only because it respects user privacy but also because it doesn’t have the nitro bs

        • m_randall@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s great to hear. Somehow everyone and everything is on discord now and I really am not a fan of it what with all the pop ups and flashing shiny things to buy lol.

          I’ll try to get my smaller groups on matrix

          • brian@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            you can run a bridge. I forget that friends are on discord sometimes bc it’s so seamless, and they can’t tell I’m not sending messages from discord either. I do have to use the discord app for voip tho

          • Ebsku@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah I still have a lot of friends that just refuse to get off Discord but at least I got a few people to move like I said

            • m_randall@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Someone replied to me that you can run a bridge and never even know. I’m definitely trying it out now. Sick of all the nitro ads.

    • CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Microsoft Roblox ripped off Discord and branded it as Guilded GG. Features-wise for audio and game streaming, they offer higher quality than Discord for free.

      Is there any chance you’ll get your group of friends to move to “MS Teams for gamers”? anything other than Discord? No chance.

      Edited: Correction that Guilded is owned by Roblox, not MS.

  • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shill element and we wouldn’t need to be in this situation people 😮‍💨

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love Element and it’s absolutely my platform of choice, but it’s years out until it can be considered a Discord competitor.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Discord is laying off 17 percent of its staff, a move that CEO Jason Citron said is meant to “sharpen our focus and improve the way we work together to bring more agility to our organization.”

    Based on Citron’s message to employees and my understanding of the business, Discord isn’t in dire financial straits, though it has yet to become profitable and is still trying to revive user growth after a surge during the pandemic.

    In his memo to employees, which you can read in full below, Citron said Discord grew its headcount too fast over the last few years — an admission that has become quite common among tech CEOs as of late.

    These cuts are Discord’s largest to date after the messaging app laid off 4 percent of staff last August.

    They add to the layoffs that continue to sweep across the tech industry, including deep cuts at Google and Amazon just this week.

    The company has been contemplating going public since it turned down a $12 billion acquisition offer from Microsoft in 2021, though I’m told it’s nowhere near close to doing so.


    The original article contains 289 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 36%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Still holding out for them to have a $10 a year tier with no added features. The $36 bucks a year entry fee is just too much.

    Can someone here explain to me why so many free services directly jump to $3, $5 or $9.99 bucks a month? Why not $10 per year? Surely that’s better than nothing?

    Just call it supporter tier and that’s it. I don’t want any icons or upload limits either. I just want to not feel like a leech. ;)

    • Nobsi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because 5 bucks a month is making way more money than 50 cents.