alexdeathway@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoELI5 the whole Wayland vs X11 going on.message-squaremessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1179arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up1163arrow-down1message-squareELI5 the whole Wayland vs X11 going on.alexdeathway@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square103fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekevincox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoI think that’s generally the point of a rewrite. To start from scratch with a better architecture. If you weren’t changing the architecture then you can probably just keep incrementally improving it.
minus-squareelauso@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoWhen you do a rewrite you want to create the same product as before just with better code / architecture. That’s not what Wayland tries to do.
I think that’s generally the point of a rewrite. To start from scratch with a better architecture. If you weren’t changing the architecture then you can probably just keep incrementally improving it.
When you do a rewrite you want to create the same product as before just with better code / architecture. That’s not what Wayland tries to do.