Age verification without name and surname: this is the way to avoid minors to watch porn.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know the EU is still kicking around the concept of making itself a root CA and each country an intermediate in that chain, then legally mandating the installation of that CA on all devices. This is dangerous as hell as it effectively defeats the purpose of TLS and gives the government(s) a way to decrypt all HTTPS traffic using those bogus cert chains.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The whole age verification can be done privately, secure and without the possibility to get tracked. But imho still not really a good thing to do. Parenting should still be a thing.

    Same discussion can be found here https://lemmy.ml/comment/6775132

    • systemd-catfoodd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thank you for the links to Wikipedia and identity.com on that other thread. I’ve yet to wrap my head around how zero-knowledge proof could work for such a basic assertion as “user is of legal age”, which calls for a 0 or 1 answer. It seems very different from the examples given of polynomial computations to prove knowledge of an exponent in a complex math expression. I can’t see what could prevent any client to simply lie about the answer here.

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But that refers to personal data, and I suppose the state will be able to identify you and your habits if it gets the logs from the websites.
      I wonder if the websites will get a unique identifier, that would allow them to track you so accurately it would make google horny.

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have you even read the linked Wikipedia or the Website? No. When implemented correctly the math shows that it is not possible.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    When you phrase it that way, it becomes all the more obvious that it’s not really about the porn.

  • montar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Looks like another govt relying on majority that has no idea about how internet works. It won’t stop kids, but pr0n sites and their partners will certainly get richer.

  • Sylocule@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    We already have digital certificates to identify ourselves on government websites to access services.

    Most likely the implementation will require sites to demand the cert for verification. What happens after that is the privacy creep