• atocci@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    They probably mean, for example, not having to prompt the user to allow installs from “unknown sources”, allowing alternative app stores to update apps and themselves automatically in the background like Google Play does, allow installations from alternative stores with one tap without extra user interaction, etc.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The nag screen is important for a bunch of less technically literate people who would otherwise install malware without thinking twice.

        Or even once.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          I really don’t know how to feel about it

          The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience

          I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though

          • huginn@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I feel like Epic wouldn’t be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate.

            But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.

            • SMillerNL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most