• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pray tell how is this any worse than Facebook? Is the CCP in the Los Angeles TikTok office moderating content?

    Or is this just more bullshit invented on the spot to justify an unconstitutional power grab?

    • Lynthe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Facebook isn’t under an obligation to provide America’s data directly to the government of a hostile foreign power. Tiktok is

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        An obligation? Is there proof of that? That’s a pretty incendiary accusation.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Bytedance owning a stake in TikTok does not mean they can require TikTok to share data. Especially if we made a common sense law to protect data saying it’s not allowed to leave the country.

            Oh wait, that’s already a thing. And we just let Meta and the other data vendors keep doing it.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Did… Did you actually read it? They sent user data for app engagement research. Oh no the CCP knows you’re a middle aged white guy in Oklahoma! The world is going to end!!!

                And if we’re going to ban any data going to the CCP then we should just do that. It’s not whataboutism to point out you’re only punishing the odd duck for a crime all of the ducks are committing openly. Make that law and reform the industry. Anything less is just a racist excuse for a fire sale.

                • Lynthe@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Nothing in the article cites a reason for why the data was sent. In fact the article specifically mentions that this data being sent was to circumvent attempts to limit the transmission of American citizens data to a hostile foreign government.

                  We should ban the sale and transmission of Americans sensitive data to hostile foreign powers regardless of the company. I support this action because it would help do that, and I would support (and I do advocate for) more broad data privacy legislation. If you support data privacy why would you not support a bill which enhances data privacy, even if it doesn’t go far enough?

                  You started this discussion with me by saying that tiktok isnt obligated to send data, when I provided sourcing to that effect you brought up corporate structure questions asking if the data was being sent. I provided a source showing that it is transmitted through those avenues regardless. Now your argument is that because we don’t have totally comprehensive data privacy regulation we can just ignore the fact that tiktok is sending American citizens private data to a hostile foreign power? If you think that isn’t a big deal just say so, then we can have an honest conversation.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Oh look, a reason-

                    The spreadsheets included users’ names, email addresses, IP addresses, and geographic and demographic information and was used to determine how to develop TikTok’s algorithm to encourage users to be more active on the app, he said.

                    And no it was their own Project Texas. Also, not nearly the data anyone is worried about. They can get that from your bank. (And yes banks sell data) That’s not a breach of national security, it’s just good business sense to retain consumers. This is also the only instance the article actually finds. The article also mentions the software programmers saying that the data coding itself is well siloed, i.e. no back doors.

                    So is this the horrible national security problem we’ve all heard so much about? A vital statistics spreadsheet you can buy from any Data Vendor? When you say they’re obligated to send information people aren’t thinking it’s just literately a headcount. They’re thinking it’s political affiliation, income, job, social networking maps, GPS travel data. You know the stuff that the CCP intelligence people could fit together to find out what kind of porn you like and figure out how they can get that kind of porn in China.

                    Every argument for why we should ban TikTok fits Facebook and Twitter just as well. They both willingly give a lot more than that spreadsheet to the CCP. Facebook is perenially in congressional hearings over getting caught doing exactly what you’re accusing TikTok of, and yet somehow here we are worrying about TikTok because of nebulous racist fearmongering that falls apart the second we find the “smoking gun”.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They’re owned by the CCP (and before you say they’re not, the ByteDance C-suite is basically all current Chinese citizens and the headquarters is in Beijing).

          Businesses and people do not have rights in the way most westerners are used to. Assume anything out of China or generally owned by Chinese companies is a direct arm of the CCP … because even if it isn’t today, the CCP can unilaterally throw down an order from the top and take control of the company/have them do whatever they want or the leaders replaced.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            So are American companies that are basically all Americans in the C-Suite owned by the US Government?

            Even if what you were saying was true, the common sense approach is to ban the trading of data internationally. Then TikTok can tell Beijing to pound sand if they tried anything. Instead we have this fear mongering racist bullshit being touted.

            • OftenWrong@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh you silly! The American corporations ARE the government at this point. But your point is valid either way. I don’t think it’s just about racism though. I think they want our data back in the US market. None of our corporate overlords can dip their greedy little fingers into TikTok data and that is very upsetting for them.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, I’m at a loss as to how people are buying this. They’re being asked to support this bill on less than zero evidence, just reporters breathlessly repeating hypothetical stuff. It’s just so obviously a called hit by our political donor class.

                • OftenWrong@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s because they’ve just decided they hate it/it’s just full of dancing teenagers for years now and nothing will ever change their minds. Which is wild because if it ever was that I never saw it and I’ve been on it for like 5-6 years at least. Everyone just bought into our gov saying they’re worried about propaganda/security when my page is mostly filled with memes, gaming stuff, gardening, recipes, cats, news, and now a bunch of people pissed off about the ban.

                  What really got me is how easily manipulated lemmy/reddit users were the second time they tried to ban it. Tiktok sent out a notification telling their users they were voting for the ban and offering to help them find their local representatives if they wanted to call them and object to it. As they should that’s how democracy is supposed to work isn’t it? Immediately they got flooded with calls from people like me telling them that we didn’t want the ban. Also immediately, the media started to spin it as a bunch of “vulnerable” teenagers and elderly people were forced or tricked into calling in their confusion… And PEOPLE BELIEVED IT. Just ate it right up. Crazy.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Yeah that was crazy. They asked people to lobby for them, as other companies have done, and suddenly they’re brainwashing our youth. Every time this comes up I feel like I’m taking crazy pills just from the sheer pressure of people saying TikTok is malware/spyware/directly controlled; but the evidence they point to is always weak at best. It’s like they think TikTok is the Chinese version of the black helicopter secret organization.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              So are American companies that are basically all Americans in the C-Suite owned by the US Government?

              Ultimately, yes. The US government can tell Google to report all searches of “I’m a goofy goober!” to them to collect a list of SpongeBob fans.

              The same is true of a company like Proton and Swiss law.

              The difference is that in the US/Switzerland/Western Democracy there are rights, laws, and courts that limit and check government power and action + open ended elections. Biden cannot just go to Elon Musk and tell him “this is my company now, you WILL report all the goofy goobers.” There are a lot of roadblocks to that kind of behavior.

              The CCP is a monoculture based around the “National People’s Congress”. The NPC is effectively the CCP because the CCP picks who is eligible to be part of the NPC https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_China

              The CCP is currently effectively controlled by Xi who has claimed increasing amounts of control over the party: https://journalofdemocracy.org/articles/china-in-xis-new-era-the-return-to-personalistic-rule/

              For all intents and purposes, what Xi wants is what happens. There is no court to check him, there is no opposition party to hold him back, and anyone that tries to stand in his way will more than likely be “punished.”

              This is not racist bull shit. It has nothing to do with Chinese people and everything to do with the CCP.

              The trading of data also has very little to do with anything. It’s about cutting off a hostile, authoritarian, foreign power from having a direct line to millions of US citizens to push whatever message they want with minimal oversight. The data is surely just icing on the cake for the CCP because they might be able to find some blackmail worthy piece of information in their hoard of metrics and videos for a current or future public figure.

              I don’t think you understand either … “Banning” something only works if they care about the law and the CCP does not care at all about US laws. If they want to break them, they will, and they will either get the people that did the job for them back to China or use people that don’t know anything/any better as scapegoats. It’s the exact same stuff any government would do, international law is imaginary because ultimately nations do not answer to nations except by diplomacy and war.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Lmao. Okay we’re done here. You have an outsized idea of nationality, government power, and what’s in TikTok data.

                • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  You’re just naive if you honestly think companies are somehow “above” the nations of their owners or that government power has some real limit beyond what other nations are willing (and able) to punish them over.

                  It’s also pretty naive to assert there’s nothing of value in that data, particularly of the blackmail variety. That stupid distasteful video you uploaded and then “deleted” at a teen … there’s no guarantee they don’t have it. The location ping your phone made when you were cheating on your spouse and opened TikTok while waiting for your mistress, there’s no guarantee they don’t have it.

                  You could even use popular political videos as the basis for evaluating who’s more likely to cooperate or believe you following an attack and mix that with geographic data to figure out how to minimize the risk of guerilla fighters. Similarly, you could use the social network graph to figure out how to put pressure on someone.

                  I mean, social media is honestly nasty in terms of what it can tell you about a society.

                  That doesn’t even begin to touch on the ability to directly manipulate a proprietary content promotion algorithm. You think they can effectively manipulate Facebook? There are no limits to the manipulation they can perform on TikTok and there is no framework for overseeing social media algorithm performance.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Multi national corporations are so beholden to their countries they cheat on their taxes and break any law they can get away with. Including selling data directly to the CCP.

                    So no. I don’t have time or the willpower to argue with someone who thinks international affairs is a video game and everything is tied to countries.

      • OftenWrong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Facebook literally conducted “social experiments” on like a million of their users and didn’t even get a slap on the wrist. What you’re saying isn’t even true but if it was so what? Another country profits off of stealing my data instead of the US? What has the US ever given me for my data? My taxes already help.fund genocides and I don’t get any say in any of it so fuck it.