• TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    Such actions should be judged not as CSAM but as defamation and libel. Anyone going around harping about AI CSAM does not care about empowering politicians and elites and will bootlick them forever happily. A drawing or AI generated media cannot be CSAM, because nobody is physically abused.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are many pedo/loli Lemmy instances that are banned. You may like those, I do not. You might have that problem you are describing in such detail.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I see, it turned out to be useful to detect reactionary baiters. People like you are useful to the state, not to the kids you are pretending to protect.

        • Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your “gubment bad” position is reactionary. Your inability or unwillingness to understand how an AI generated image of a naked body with a minor’s likeness superimposed on top of it is CSAM is telling of your true motivation. You are the type of person who reads 1984 and can’t do anything but identify with the main character, completely ignoring how dispicable and low that character is. The state is by no means perfect but its a whole lot better than the bullshit you are peddling. Eat Shit and die pedo apologist.