• Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Copyright Infringment strawman argument. When considering AI, we are not talking legal copyright infringement in the relationship between humans vs AI. Humans are mostly concerned with being obsoleted by Big Tech so the real issue is Intellectual Property Theft.

    artificial INTELLIGENCE stole our Intellectual Property

    Do you see it now?

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      What I see is a system of laws that came about during the Middle Ages and have been manipulated by the powers that be to kill off any good parts of them.

      We all knew copyright was broken. It was broken before my grandparents were born. It didn’t encourage artists or promise them proper income, it didn’t allow creations to gradually move into public domain. It punished all forms of innovation from player pianos to fanfiction on Tumblr.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s only theft as long as you cling to the failed “copyright” model.

      Big tech couldn’t steal anything if we don’t respect their property rights in the first place.

      By reifying copyright under the AI paradigm, we maintain big tech’s power over us.

      The truth is chatgpt belong to us. ClosedAI is just the compiler of the data.

      If we finally end the failed experiment of copyright, we destroy their mote.