Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoMeta removes Trump account restrictions ahead of 2024 electionwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1480arrow-down115
arrow-up1465arrow-down1external-linkMeta removes Trump account restrictions ahead of 2024 electionwww.axios.comBeaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareJohn_McMurray@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down16·1 month agoThey’re all fucking fascists, Trumps just not part of the old agenda.
minus-squareTodd Bonzalez@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 month agoFascism has a fairly concrete definition, and while it does exist on a spectrum, I’ll take the 15% fascist party over the 100% fascist party, hands down. Not a hard decision. 15 is closer to zero than 100, so we’re closer to the ideal.
minus-squareJohn_McMurray@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoOh if we are using that definition, then none of them are
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoImagine saying something and then completely reversing yourself when confronted with a basic definition.
minus-squareJohn_McMurray@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoWord has about 500 definitions. You’re clearly using the most archaic one out of convenience
They’re all fucking fascists, Trumps just not part of the old agenda.
Fascism has a fairly concrete definition, and while it does exist on a spectrum, I’ll take the 15% fascist party over the 100% fascist party, hands down. Not a hard decision. 15 is closer to zero than 100, so we’re closer to the ideal.
Oh if we are using that definition, then none of them are
Imagine saying something and then completely reversing yourself when confronted with a basic definition.
Word has about 500 definitions. You’re clearly using the most archaic one out of convenience