• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      What part of “Pornography should be outlawed” don’t you understand. That also entails owning and viewing porn.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If it actually does entail owning and viewing porn then the quote should match the claim. The document is like 1000 pages, if its in there then it needs to be quoted in the graphic.

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        80
        ·
        1 month ago

        Outlawed isn’t equal to prison, it could be just a penalty fee, so it’s not like if you see pornography you will go to jail like OP make it look.

        Wokie sensationalism not too much different than west media propaganda tbh.

        • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So, why should people be fined for watching porn? Why does christian puritan views be pushed to everyone? Party of small government my ass.

          “It’s not that bad” isn’t good enough. Why is that there, at all? Why should I somehow deserve to be in prison?

        • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Holy fucking shit how have you not learned to shut your dumb redneck mouth after being downvoted of every one of your last 100 comments.

      • tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sending nudes to your partner counts as production and distribution of pornography

        This obviously deserves the death penalty