Cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike pushed an update that caused millions of Windows computers to enter recovery mode, triggering the blue screen of death. Learn …

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    In a way, it was. If Windows was not as crappy as it is, external solutions would not be needed.

    • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Linux machines also require Crowdstrike because of business requirements. That does mean Linux is just as crap as Windows then?

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Probably the latter. Though, I’m not familiar enough with cybersecurity to make a comment on that.

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not to jump at you in another comment thread, but any OS that is deployed in a business environment should have some form of endpoint protection installed unless it is fully airgapped + isolated.

          Despite the myth that “Linux doesn’t get malware”, it absolutely does and should have protection installed. Even if the OS itself was immune to infection, any possible update can introduce a vulnerability to that.

          Additionally, again, even if the OS (or kernel in the case of linux) couldn’t be infected or attacked, the packages or services installed can be attacked, infected, or otherwise messed with and should be protected.

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is your point “Linux and Mac dont get viruses or targeted for cyberattacks”?

      Or is it “This wouldn’t have broken on a different operating system”?

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No to both. Windows is so broken, it needs kernel-level external software to protect it from attacks that should not be possible in the first place. It is a joke of history that this software was even worse than windows itself.

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I see you’re operating on a plane of reality where windows is the only bad software, so it’s kinda pointless for me to continue here. I hope you have a wonderful day.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Windows is definitely not the only bad software, but for the amount of resources they could spend on quality, it is a rather shitty product. They could do better, but they don’t want to.