From their About page:
Project Liberty is stitching together an ecosystem of technologists, academics, policymakers and citizens committed to building a people-powered internet—where the data is ours to manage, the platforms are ours to govern, and the power is ours to reclaim.
I just heard Frank McCourt on a podcast plugging his book “Our Biggest Fight”.
It was great to hear someone with a voice talking about the problems we see with user data and social media, especially the problem of the Social Graph (the map of all your social connections, which includes weights and values).
Their solution to this problem was to develop a social networking protocol that enables any compliant app to use (think how email works - a standard protocol, SMTP), but encrypted and user data controlled by the user. They call it DSNP - Decentralized Social Networking Protocol.
I see both sides of their approach, I’m kind of ambivalent, lots of concern here long-term.
They’ve already acquired MeWe and have converted some users to this protocol. He wants to buy the US side of TikTok (if it becomes available) and convert it to DSNP, which would encrypt about 30 million US accounts.
I’m always cynical about stuff that sounds promising, but I don’t have the tech background to really dissect what they’re doing. Anyone understand this better?
Yea, the hype stuff is concerning. I don’t trust all this data in one basket approach.
From a protocol standpoint, I think part of the intent is to have a standardized way to interconnect from disparate social platforms - think email with SMTP. But is that really the answer (like you, I don’t think it is).
But that again is pretty scary in my mind - everything all in one basket, again. Do they really intend to build something secure and stable, or is it another honeypot?
It seems like they’re building “The One” social graph, which is even more concerning