Matthew Hodgson, technical co-founder of the Matrix open standard, told us: “This has nothing to do with the Matrix protocol; it’s just an unfortunate naming coincidence.”

  • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    yeaah I fucked up, I didn’t read far enough into the article hence why I deleted my comment a second after posting😬

    That’s another poor mistake that I’m gonna try to not repeat

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No worries, The Register hid the clarification about the two different networks way down at the end, so it’s an easy mistake. I honestly think they need to put that note at the beginning to avoid confusion.

      • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I honestly think they need to put that note at the beginning to avoid confusion.

        Agreed. I really hate it when publications add disclaimers and revisions or updates to the bottom of the page. It’ll always benefit their readers anyways if they decided to put that information at the top of the page