I don’t know anything about sponsor agreements. Just because the sponsors don’t have direct access, that doesn’t mean there aren’t other ways for them to get that information.

Big tech is the problem. Indie tech is still cool as shit.

Sounds like a you problem. You fucked up so everyone needs constant surveillance? Fuck that authoritarian nonsense and fuck you for supporting it.

YouTube knows exactly where you start and stop the video, what segments you skip, etc., etc. and the channel has access to those analytics. Not saying that anyone shares that with the sponsors, but the mechanism IS in place.

That Mitchell and Webb Look! Hilarious British sketch comedy show, and if you enjoy it, check out Peep Show by the same comedians, David Mitchell and Robert Webb. Even funnier IMO!

Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can’t be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.

Dude, rain water is full of pollutants too. 😂

Literally not what I said. Its fucking amusing though you telling me I’m wrong because you found a mislabelled image online when you clearly know jack shit about what you’re talking about. Just because you’re able to find someone who speak incorrectly on the subject, that doesn’t make it correct. Educate yourself, please, before you embarrass yourself any further.

A cartridge,[1][2] also known as a round, is a type of pre-assembled firearm ammunition packaging a projectile (bullet, shot, or slug), a propellant substance (smokeless powder, black powder substitute, or black powder) and an ignition device (primer or percussion cap) within a metallic, paper, or plastic case that is precisely made to fit within the barrel chamber of a breechloading gun, for convenient transportation and handling during shooting.[3] Although in popular usage the term “bullet” is often used to refer to a complete cartridge, the correct usage only refers to the projectile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_(firearms)

Now kindly fuck off.

In the English speaking world, not really, no. People with little firearms experience incorrectly refer to cartridges as bullets, but they are exactly that: incorrect.

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

Literally not at all what I said. Put that shit back in your ass where it belongs.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

And millions of people enjoy trash mobile games that throw microtransactions at you every couple of minutes. Popularity is not an indicator of quality.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

I do know what I’m talking about. Your link is incorrect. What you’re showing me a photo of is an ammo cartridge. A cartridge contains a bullet, a casing, gunpowder, and a primer. The part labelled projectile is the bullet. Not all projectiles are bullets, but all bullets are projectiles. The (typically brass) casing houses the gunpowder and the bullet is seated in the opening of the casing, with the primer at the closed end. All these components together is called a cartridge. You can buy bullets on their own, sure, but if you just buy a box of bullets all you are getting is the projectile. If you buy a box of ammo, you are buying a box of cartridges.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.

They enforce plenty of draconian shit just fine, I think they can find a way.

That’s the entirety of this thread, that if companies are being reimbursed, then people should also be reimbursed.

And the company should be legally held responsible go reimbursing its customers.