Nancy.
Nancy.
Which is in turn on Netanyahu’s leash.
And Netanyahu hopes to accomplish his goals before that can happen.
Then I’ll respond to the new bit:
The way they do things is an inherently unsustainable house of cards propped up by US goodwill that they’re squandering away. And they are squandering it, because that shit isn’t infinite no matter how much the Israeli public would like to think otherwise.
There are 4 years between this presidential election and the next, during which time that goodwill can go into negative numbers and the electorate can do nothing.
Will it? Who’s gonna stop 'em?
The infuriating thing about that is that the CIA didn’t have to fucking brag about their methods.
They think they can afford to double down on everything.
As long as they have the US’ support, they are right about this.
Sees like Israel is banking 100 % on trump winning the election.
And we keep playing into his hands.
Israel has to drag the US into another great war before the election.
As though we’re being dragged. Given the current administration, we’re joyously frolicking into war along with our best buddy Netanyahu with the Turtles’ “Happy Together” playing in the background.
That’s the idea.
When someone else is providing the means, efficiency is less of a concern.
So are we changing our policy regarding selling them weapons no matter what?
This isn’t a win for the Israelis who wanted a ceasefire or the hostages released.
So it’s a win for Netanyahu who wants neither of those things.
“Unlucky Backup” is probably worse.
Everyone’s a normie in some field. “Normie” is context-dependent in all cases.
I think you are mistaking which one in this relationship calls the other “daddy.”
Shunt.
I remember them doing this with Internet Explorer back in the 90s.
“We can’t remove this thing we don’t want to remove! Look! It’s hastily integrated with the OS! We can’t remove it ever!”
I wish the US election wasn’t between Neville Chamberlain and Vidkun Quisling.
It’s neat when centrists say the only part out loud.