You know fascism has a definition, right? It doesn’t mean “I don’t like it”.
You know fascism has a definition, right? It doesn’t mean “I don’t like it”.
I think it makes more sense to read that it’s a “Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)”.
Generally, yeah. The way they worked with Mick Gordon last game was awful though.
That’s assuming that they’re authentic and not propaganda pieces…
He’s probably talking about the article released by Mozilla a few weeks ago.
But basically all car manufacturers have absolutely terrible privacy policies.
I’ve used Authy for years now without issue. Seems it’s not a popular option anymore.
Is there something I should know about? Or are other options much better now?
I’m one that finds the GNU/Linux naming annoying. I think calling it that is mostly silly, and am mostly annoyed at people who militantly argue it’s the only way to describe a Linux OS (which aren’t as common as they used to be).
To me, it’s just overly verbose and pointless. For the most part, the GNU part has been implied for pretty much any mainstream form of Linux for decades. And even if it wasn’t, who cares? Like, you wouldn’t say that you run KDE/X11/wpasupplicant/neovim/docker/pacman/paru/systemd/GNU/Linux… Just saying KDE on Arch Linux is simpler and far more informative.