MotoAsh

lol well… not exactly what I meant, but OK.

You do point at yet another problem with the idea, though: Not all “unpopular” opinions are bad opinions, and exposing everything for judgement all the time would only further promote same-think under capitalism.

Oh I’m not sorry for their consequences. That doesn’t make removing all privacy a good idea.

Though think of privacy as offering a feeling of safety. We wouldn’t know they literally said they love Hitler if they wouldn’t have felt safe enough to voice it. They didn’t think it WOULD be leaked. They just knew their opinion was gross to the mainstream.

I’m SURE you have said many things the mainstream would call gross. Maybe not necessarily hateful and vile ontop of that, but gross and ostracizing worthy to some none the less. Would you be OK with people ostracizing you for less than what they’ve said?

Would you have said/done those things if you knew it could be looked up by your name?

It’s by definition not private if others can just look it up. I’d say no. Nobody deserves to be judged by their employer or others for EVERYTHING they do or say. Everybody has a bad day sometimes. Everyone gets really annoyed and says mean stuff.

Furthermore, privacy has profound mental health implications. People that cannot get privacy develop mental disorders like paranoia, anxiety, self-doubt, and all sorts of other problems.

On top of that, if they knew their messages could’ve been leaked… do you think they would’ve said it in the first place? They WOULD be thinking it, but you wouldn’t know.

Invading everyone’s privacy because you don’t want to have to exercise your brain is a terrible thing to ask. To those of us that do know how to observe and think, it’s pretty damn obvious when someone is a pile of crap like these people. Removing ALL privacy just so dummies can agree is… one of the worst possible reasons to remove privacy.

They won’t all be interchangeable. They can have totally different max power delivery, and a device is free to require more (up to 240W by spec). The nice thing about USB-PD is it’s negotiated and a device won’t (shouldn’t) try to pull too much power for a given plug. So as long as everyone sticks to specs, they’ll be interchangeable so long as the supply can supply enough. If it cannot, at least a device should keep itself off as if a chord isn’t plugged in, or preferably have some sort of “supply too low” sign.

Yes. Yes implying plurality for a singular thing is, by definition, exaggerating.

Always has been, hence why giving any of them power was beyond fucking braindead.

Yea, that’s why I’d rather the government itself have an endpoint where the hard part is already implemented.

… ok I’d rather these stupid de-anonymizing laws were found to be against the constitution and completely unable to be forced on us…

Eh, IF the government had an endpoint to verify ID information, it wouldn’t be too bad implementation wise. … buuuut the modern government doesn’t provide anything any more and every damn dev team on the planet shouldn’t have forced access to peoples’ freaking IDs…

Yea, but that’s infinitely better than WhatsApp where every piece of data is owned by Facebook and sold to every marketing firm in the world and freely handed over to cops.

Why was it exposed to the internet with all ports open? Even Linux is getting hacked if you’re fucking rawdogging every packet that shows up…

(yes I know it’s likely from a bunch of BS services only Windows would be dumb enough to enable by default, but the point still stands that any computer that’s exposed to the internet directly needs to be carefully locked down)

Only people suffering from Dunning Kruger effect think “AI” is competent.

Interesting how much power morons have.

But no AI models are ethical because they’ve all been trained on material that they did not have the rights to… Ok ok, I’m sure some niche models have been, but literally none of the major corpo products that are most likely to be used were.

Signal isn’t dodgy like WhatsApp is. It’s just not perfectly anonymous.

lol a minority with the majority of power…

Do you … do you not understand how systemic racism works…?

Wait, this depends on how someone views it… If they’re a fucking idiot with a child’s understanding, a binary reality means it requires altering someones’ body to transition. That’s the only perspective where it’s “modifying” someones’ body.

If you’re an adult with a developed brain and a basic highschool understanding of genetics, it’s not exactly modifying ones’ body, but merely influencing hormones to reflect how someone feels.

If you’re an adult with a collegiate level of understanding, then people ‘feeling’ like a different gender is the fucking tip of the iceberg, and genetics fucking demonstrates that it’s way more complex.

What is said in the bible, is that reality is more complex than dummies can understand, so leave judging up to God.

To think knowing things is bad in any way is to eat one’s own asshole.

No shit. Nowhere did I say you’d convince a bigot with these arguments, especially bigots as committed to the bit as Israelis…

BTW, if you think Palestinians are a majority in relation to Israel and the other nations involved in that conflict, ESPECIALLY in power, then you are only exemplifying your lack of understanding of how the real world works.

If they turn it in to a white genocide problem, then you already have your answer: They don’t care about minorities.

Their purity test: You must not deny genocide.

What you heard their purity test was: They must accept that any and all genocides that I think exist are real and a big problem.

Again, you fucking morons are inferring things that aren’t there just to try and be witty, while utterly missing the point…

Congratulations on failing your reading comprehension test.

English must be so hard for you when you utterly fail to understand how assumptions work. Good job being a piece of shit contributing to the problem you’re attempting to be above.