Now you have to update your CalDav entries

Brain: 0%

Could be that you loaded an incomplete set the second time…? 🤷

That would make it stop at the end of the bootloader with decryption failure, not full bricking

Could be a UEFI bug in the VM itself;

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot#Using_your_own_keys

Could also be that you didn’t sign your boot image since that command seems to load the secure boot signing key into the UEFI firmware, if you cleared other signing keys then potentially no code can load. You would have to load the keys for whatever UEFI firmware vendor is used (presumably that made by the VM software maker) or sign it yourself, etc.

https://repository.tilburguniversity.edu/bitstreams/97187bcf-4ad2-402c-ac05-e565346d09b6/download

EU has similar laws and Dutch law allows for striking illegally collected evidence if the infringement was severe

https://www.kolibrios.org/en

Absolutely tiny yet has a lot of functionality

Biking or swimming

Just give it a grill faceplate

Just realized my post could be read wrong.

I meant that the above would be forced onto candidates as they sign up for an election.

Move all control of all business into a fully independent trust, or something. Maybe even one controlled in a different country if you’re really paranoid.

Yup, FEX to translate x86 to ARM.

Most of those things would only be possible by hiding them in a system update

It’s possible but complicated.

Since apps have access to the TPM API they can encrypt their own data in such a way that only the app’s own authorized processes can retrieve the decryption key from the TPM chip

There’s measures they could use in theory, but if you switch keyboard app away from Google’s and set private text mode, enable screenshot protection, etc, then you should be good.

Surprise trinary!

For sites you visit occasionally, it’s better to enable tab isolation (use the containers feature) and then enable JS only for that domain (note the difference between allowing JS from that domain in any tab, vs only allowing that tab with that domain to use JS, you should do the latter)

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

If you’re switching to a different browser you may as well use the same browser but a second clean profile and use private tabs so it doesn’t retain history. Using private tabs in your main browser profile does also help but isn’t perfect because there’s still some metadata leaks occasionally.

Using a different browser could ironically make you easier to track - how unique you are is the main signal used to track you (user agent, OS, language, etc), and going for an even more rare config will help their tracking even if you delete session cookies. Especially if they have a tracker across multiple domains you visit from different browsers from the same IP, with similar device fingerprinting results across browsers. That’s a strong signal those sessions are linked. You want to NOT stand out to maintain your privacy.

You can either follow the instructions or spend one of your 9 lives

[Windows subsystem] for [executable environment] is the naming scheme. The default is Win32, there’s one for POSIX (practically never used), and Linux runs in another.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/41409419

Malicious compliance is when you follow a order or law knowing that it will backfire on those who issued it.

“Lawfare” is a comparable term but not quite it (basically legal harassment campaigns).