For true immutability, burn something like tails on a read-only CD.
For true immutability, burn something like tails on a read-only CD.
From my understanding, MV3 kills vital features of ad-blockers in that
How to poison AI models for fun and (at the cost of other people’s) profit
Wikimedia Foundation (the org behind the Wikipedia and similar projects) does get more donations than their operational cost, but that’s expected. The idea is that they’ll invest the extra fund[1] and some day the return alone will be able to sustain Wikipedia forever.
Although, some have criticized that the actual situation is not clearly conveyed in their asking for donation message. It gives people an impression that Wikipedia is going under if you don’t donate.
Others also criticized that the feature development is slow compared to the funding, or that not enough portion is allocated to the feature development. See how many years it takes to get dark mode! I don’t know how it’s decided or what’s their target, so I can’t really comment on this.
They publish their annual financial auditions[2] and you can have a read if you’re interested. There are some interesting things. For example, in 2022-2023, processing donations actually costs twice as much as internet hosting, which one would expect to be the major expense.
The link to the study is just a “Paid Search Ad” page. Ouch for the professionalism of Forbes.
They are also band names.
And he died anyway
Sean k strikes it again.
They tried to build this abomination in London and it got shot down.
Maybe I’m missing something, but shouldn’t the benchmark be a good approximation to the real workload? I don’t see how the measurements reflect the performance difference in real life usages.
Why would I need 100MiB/s processing as opposed to 20MiB/s processing, when I can only read maybe several lines per second?
Basically it’s two people saying “Is it falling? Wouldn’t it explode? I’m recording it. Fuck the rocket is falling!”
From 5-8 seconds, the person seems to be saying争着争着中火大了, which doesn’t mean anything to me, but it may be something of the local dialect.
Yes for OCaml. Haskell’s inequality is defined as /=
(for ≠). <>
is usually the Monoid mappend
operator (i.e. generalized binary concatenation).
Let me simplify it: proceeds to print the same expression
Deprecation warnings should contain suggestions for alternatives.
The Chinese Great Firewall (GFW) has already been using machine learning to detect “illegal” traffics. The arms race is moving towards the Cyberpunk world where AIs are battling against an AI firewall.
Such a shame on the activists to spread disinformation. It was Lizzy who crushed the economy, #NOT THE LETTUCE!