Its working for me

Use gboards with a firewall blocking any traffic from it.

This will be last 🥲

I appreciate every single second you spent on this, I hope more people will benefit

https://adspthepodcast.com/

Recommendation algorithm does not only consider your watch history. There are other factors.

Actually, some of us didnt

deleted by creator

For every single way that you may be using to reach out the internet, there will always going to be an exit node which won’t be able to hide out itself. You may still use ssl or whatever you want (cant think of anything else that widely used) to encrypt the connection, as you normally do on your computer every time like you try to reach out a server with https. But I still take some actions that are not being encrypted between me and other side which I don’t want to be related with me. So basically, I don’t want some of my traffic to be exposed to ISP or any possible other threat. In order to provide that, I find a vps provider which has enough internet traffic to not use ISP to access internet(like many big tech companies do), and buy a vps from there anonymously(of course my ip is being exposed here but it is also being exposed on other vpn services and I am not doing something that important to make my ip so much important to hide). Afterwards I setup a wireguard or openvpn (depends on your needs) server and connect it from my pc. Which basically works like a vpn service that many people subscribe.

As far as I can see(if I am not mistaken somewhere), if you have a problem with this kind of protocol, then you have a problem with vpn services itself. And if you have a problem with that, and need more anonymity, you can connect to a public wifi and then a vpn and then a distributed network like tor.

My mistake, sorry. I should have also said on a vps.

Self hosted

I have read it but I have still a question in mind. Okay god doesn’t provide moral reasons to act the way it wants so what? It is god, it says us to do something and if we don’t it punishes, if we do it rewards.

This is a different way to look at the situation we are in but it doesn’t change anything about the situation. If one believes in god, one should still have to act the way god says. That does just mean they don’t do what they do for moral reasons, they do what they do for the sake of award given by god.

Thanks for the resource

Sorry about the confusion. I just have a lot in my mind about our capacity of understanding, so I just messed up a bit with asking right questions.

I will do further research on mutual perception of concepts.

And I will certainly be going to check out “Quine’s criticism” since it seems to suit my mindset and I like it just by doing preliminary research.

Thanks

Years of experience speaking:

• Make it work
• Make it right
• Make it fast

If your end results are following this pattern, no one gives a fuck how you do

I appreciate your effort to answer, but I couldn’t find the relevance of this with my question.

Religion part is just how I ended up posting this. My question is:

One of the great starting points in many fields, like science or philosophy is “I am probably wrong about many things — because I am unable to know everything, let’s see what I don’t know and put it to the test”

Can I do this to analytical truths because when I do, I couldn’t find any claim to support them. I am clueless about, does our logic and reasoning correct?

I know “regress problem of justification” but checking it out again on stanford encyclopedia really widen my view, but still clueless whats the answer since there is also a conflict about the topic among academia.

Thanks for book recommendation, it touches on many topics, but I certainly will check out.

Analytic truths are true by virtue of the meaning of their words

Expressing this like seem to me as “They are true because we say so”. It is supported with how we define it, so there is no external claim to support it, so how can we be sure they are correct.

Without wishing to lay down the law, I think “Euthyphro dilemma” is easy to answer, depending on your definition of god. My definition being: God is the creator of everything. There was nothing before it. It can alter or destroy everything, also it can create anything. So pious things defined by god. It didn’t love something and defined it as “good”, it willed everything to happen and named things “good”.

Socrates says:

Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?

Pious didn’t exist before god, so “it is pious because god willed”.

And may I ask why does god need justification; assuming god(my definition) exists, reasoning, logic and other things can not exist without its will, so they were not there when god was. Doesn’t that make god free from logicality?

I hope it is not annoying to answer a clueless like me, thanks for help.

Forget about the religion part, it is just how i ended up post this.

So first things first, I am not saying take something random as premise, what i am saying is you can take a related premise like god to base your actions(praise, not lying etc.). And someone else can question that premise, which is god.

From here i want to question something else, premises that are more foundational like analytical truths. For example: A is B B is C C is A

Here I just want to ask a one simple question: How?

What does “A is equivalent to B” mean here. That’s what I say. Me, myself couldn’t find an answer to this question. It is just obvious, intuitional but I just can’t answer “How?”.

Wtf dude how did you make bluetooth work

As a linux user, i always change my user agent. And i think many of the linux users also switch user agents so how correct is this data?

Go to releases on codeberg