I mean, I generally agree with your assessment, but elite dangerous? I love Elite, but it is not a good game. Best thing to come from Elite Dangerous is the community.
I mean, I generally agree with your assessment, but elite dangerous? I love Elite, but it is not a good game. Best thing to come from Elite Dangerous is the community.
“Agnes” is one hundred percent a fossil you saw driving on the highway.
As much as I loved this movie (it was my first exposure to trek at all, which franchise has ultimately made me a better person), I hate that Abrams does what he does. His influence tends to just ruin things.
Looks weird from my side too, when someone starts frothing at the mouth about monopolies when steam is so much as mentioned.
It’s by the same studio that started and then killed “The Cycle”, that extraction shooter that had way too many problems in its development cycle.
Sponsored results make me irrationally angry and push me to Kagi every time I see them.
Didn’t a solar flare just hit us today? I assume that’s the reason
Yeah, and I’m talking to you. All I said was that I wasn’t the same person you asked your original question to. “Who are you talking to?” Was not asked to me. I must not have taught you very well.
In comment sections and threads, anybody can jump into conversations. You can see that when I jumped in after you asked a question.
Different person. Next lesson we’ll learn about usernames.
You must be new here. This is a comment section. Others call it a thread. You use it to comment on things.
You are correct, I too tend to humanize LLMs to some degree.
FYI the only source listed anywhere in the article is Bard itself. This journalist seems to just interview an LLM and take the outputs as fact.
Public service announcement: this article seems to be written like their only source was asking Bard some questions. If you trust Bard enough to tell you Google’s plans, you may as well be asking it when the second coming is happening, because it’ll be just as confident when it hallucinates that answer too.
LMAO I opened the link expecting an article, and I got a steady flow of quotations, but nothing to indicate who is being quoted. At the very end, the sentence “For its part, Bard states…” is used, and I can think of no clearer way to display your fundamental misunderstanding of AI. Bard can’t “state” shit in any official capacity. Bard is the same caliber of LLM as GPT, and both have a documented tendency to hallucinate.
I don’t know if anybody answered your question, lemmy is weird about replies deleted or not showing. AD is Active Duty, which is anyone in the federal component of the military i.e. not guardsmen. “Active” means full-time, and most guardsmen are one-weekend a month, so they are not active. It’s a little fuzzy, because if a guardsman is on full time orders, depending on where the money is coming from, it could be called AGR, or Active Guard Reserve, but they are not technically Active Duty (AD).
All you really need to know is that AD is just the Big Army or Big Air Force, paid for and run by the federal government, and the national guard is distinct from AD because of split loyalty to state and federal govt, and they are usually paid by the state. Otherwise, same regulations, same uniforms, same bad leadership.
These knife-eared snowflakes get whinier and whinier
Reverse umbrellas are the best. Hands down.