Mastodon: @canpolat@hachyderm.io
Not sure but that sounds like you have a problem with your Git installation (or a dependency of Git). Maybe a reinstallation can solve that.
I understand the “why would I pay for this” reaction. I think crowdsourcing is a better approach for these kinds of content. Once you reach certain level of financial commitment from the crowd, you can give away the PDF and sell the print copy.
git branches are just homeomorphic endofunctors mapping submanifolds of a Hilbert space
Yeah, once you realize that everything falls into place.
I believe you can replace start
with the command that is suitable for your system (e.g., xdg-open
for linux).
Here is the link to the original website (an NGO that monitors blocked websites in Turkey): https://ifade.org.tr/engelliweb/distrowatch-erisime-engelledi/
And here is the Google translation of the text on that page:
The IP address of the DistroWatch platform, which provides news, reviews, rankings and general information about Linux distributions, was blocked by the National Cyber Incident Response Center (USOM) on the grounds of “IP hosting/spreading malware”.
What checkout
actually does. Here is a past comment with links to the courses (they are pay-walled, unfortunately)
I don’t think I read that one. I created a separate link-post for that one. Thanks.
Mine happened when I watched Paolo Perrota’s Git courses on Pluralsight. That’s when it clicked for me.
The URL seems to have a typo. Correct URL is https://github.com/presslabs/gitfs
I know you said “self hosted”, but if you are interested in an Android app, Google Play Books does most of what you want, I think. You can upload your books, and read them on any device (with offline capabilities). But this is the Self Hosted community, so I will show myself out.
That’s explained at the end (Revisions). Fowler is probably looking for a general term that can be used to describe this specific way of debugging. Since he is aware of git bisect
(and I’m sure he knows about hg bisect
) there must be a reason he is not preferring “bisect debugging,” for example.
Edit: The term diff
has a clear link with version control. bisect
is not that obvious. It may be ambiguous/vague in debugging context. I would still call it “bisect debugging.”
Beginning in Git 2.43, Git will realize when it’s about to perform a double-revert, and instead produce the much more pleasing message
Doesn’t happen very often, but I’m glad we have a better solution to this now.
This sounds more like a Github question.
Reading the manual? That’s cheating!
Apart from the historical value, the most important part of this article now is the “Note of reflection” added 10 years after it’s inception:
If your team is doing continuous delivery of software, I would suggest to adopt a much simpler workflow (like GitHub flow) instead of trying to shoehorn git-flow into your team.
I don’t think this work flow is relevant any more even for teams that don’t do CD, to be honest. It was a messy work flow to begin with and I haven’t seen it applied successfully in practice.
I have had Pluralsight for many years now and I agree with you. In some cases they have excellent courses, but I sometimes find the content outdated. I plan to explore O’Reily’s platform next year. They seem to have a different set of resources and are comparable in price.
I don’t think Git has built-in support for that, but there seems to be some syntax/language aware diff tools that can be configured as the difftool
.
I see. Good luck with your search. Would be great if you could update the thread once you settle on a solution.
Don’t they already have the names Leap and Tumbleweed? Changing the name to Leap would make sense since it’s the name of the “official LTS” version. At this point it sounds like “openSUSE” is the name of the project and not the distro. But I haven’t been following them closely, so perhaps I’m wrong.