Right, on shared branch you might need to pull first if you’re out of date (and you would be if you’re all leaving the office at the same time), and that could cause a merge conflict.
It’s like I always said, bad branching strategies are a fire safety issue.
On a push? What are you merging there?
That lack of communication along with a ban is a pretty important difference, thanks for highlighting it. Maybe the mod could also send a message to the user with the context of the ban, but they have to do it manually.
I appreciate your light touch on moderation, though I think you might want to have really basic rules e.g. no CP, to protect yourself as the apparent owner of the site.
Based on the only recently removed user and their visible posts I’d say it’s fair to call it not suitable for the community and also that they had a raw deal - should have been given a warning or something before the ban. I’d be happy to see content like that but likely would need a dedicated community for spicy memes.
I definitely think the community should call out the limits.
Thanks for sharing the mod log and your views!
Do you know a Lemmy app which actually lets you preview links before opening them? I’d like to test my suspicions sometimes but don’t have the option.
Couple of spoilers in that article, admittedly the game has been around for a while but thought I’d mention it in case you’re trying to avoid them.
It’s all human readable abstractions for 0s and 1s, isn’t it? Unless you’re working with quantum computers.
We want to draw the line somewhere, so my mum on FB doesn’t call herself a programmer for creating a post, but it’s not very clear where to put that line. I think it has to depend on the context, you could tell your hairdresser you’re a programmer to avoid the unnecessary details, but wouldn’t describe it as such in a job interview.
I’d like to assume the compliance plan involves that - or at least moving it to a safer orbit - but it’s probably more likely the plan is just saying “we won’t do it again”.
Not that person, but the update is really good.
Throwing weapons are decent to use now (they were awful when they were added). I like the new skill tree and while I’m feeling a bit constrained by the cyberware limits I can see how it would make me feel much more powerful if I built towards it, instead of just having ED and SC limits I can easily exceed.
Do you have to have played the witness to get the jokes, or does it stand alone?
The bot compresses an article about how AI are good at compression… how deep does this go?
No, the name is in the comic - Mart Virkus. I like his stuff. https://arcaderage.co/
We have a slightly later leaf with ~30k but now it’s getting older the range is only about 80mi in warm weather (much worse in cold). It’s not really viable for distances, but we could hire an ICE for those rare occasions.
Why is it neutral evil to have a monitor without a face?
See a sharp rise? Was that an intentional C# reference?
Well they weren’t going to admit it…
As is tradition.
There are built in ways to bring them back, and make the players aware that Barovia has an unconventional relationship with death. This is an opportunity more than a problem, and a good early warning system if your players are not ready for that kind of story.
Fair enough, but I think a ranger could also do that as well as their extra attack (you’re just using the crossbow expert feat right?)
Should that be rogue’s attack at the top? They do one big attack, rangers get extra attack.
It’s supposed to be in the game but in the main menu instead of the pause menu. They’ve had main menu popups for dlc for years, not sure if I’ve seen ads for other games before.