I can sell you a copy of lemmys source code, are you interested?
I can sell you a copy of lemmys source code, are you interested?
sure they do, you’re one of them
people on mastodon need to mention a lemmy community to post there. you can’t see mastodon posts on lemmy unless they’re in a community. comments from lemmy are a pretty bad experience on mastodon I believe.
you can enable end to end encryption, it’s optional. I don’t think it’s enabled by default.
until 0.19.4 is released, clients are supposed to suppress comment contents when the comment is either marked as removed
(moderator) or deleted
(creator).
they might decide to show contents to site admins or community moderators anyway, but some clients did not implement this properly and show the original content to all users.
this is of course not something that should have been available to everyone in the first place, which is why this is being fixed in 0.19.4.
depending on the client, you should still see some kind of indicator above the comment text that shows it was removed or deleted, in this case removed.
won’t be the case for much longer, the next lemmy release is removing that.
i suggest you remove this quote and summarize it with fewer details if you need to have it there in the first place. you’re effectively advertising for them now and undoing the moderator action of removing this advertisement.
reporting absolutely helps. it increases visibility for content that slipped through automated moderation and having more reports for content indicates urgency.
here’s also some more context and explanation about what’s going on:
https://fedi.fyralabs.com/notes/9psdqurvye
https://fedi.fyralabs.com/notes/9psnooe6p1
https://fedi.fyralabs.com/notes/9pth6oh3xr
at that point you’ll just discourage any new users if they have to gamble on whether or not their content is actually seen by anyone. account age really isn’t a good indicator of anything other than soemone being dedicated enough to spam. considering this isn’t the first wave of csam attacks, i can assure you that whoever is targeting lemmy with this is determined enough that account age won’t deter them for long, they’ll just have to slightly adjust their playbook.
that doesn’t do anything, they’ll just register accounts in advance and wait some days.
we’ve even had spam recently from accounts that had been dormant for months, although it was a different kind of spam.
account deletion does not federate in general, only banning (+ content removal) does
requiring an app to open chests? what?
I’m glad I’ve been avoiding Ubisoft like the plague they are for all the other issues already.
i don’t want to go to all that effort
nearly all talks are either in English or have English translations. not sure if they’re available on YouTube but you should be able to find everything on https://media.ccc.de
you can just turn it off, see https://help.kagi.com/kagi/settings/general.html
true, my comment was primarily from the perspective of the recipient of tracking links
I haven’t checked how reddit does this but just from the example it seems like there is no anti tracking from the use of urlcheck that you’re describing.
reddit appears to generate tracking link with a specific numeric identifier in their database, so instead of attaching a bunch of removable url parameters they instead do a lookup in their database and then redirect to the original destination.
this also means your app checking the redirect will need to fetch the url to determine the destination, which means their tracking still works just fine.
edit: a word
based on https://help.apple.com/xcode/mac/current/#/deve2819c518 it seems like users may need to explicitly enable sharing crash data with app developers.
I don’t know what the default for this is.
https://help.apple.com/xcode/mac/current/#/dev9a80ab71d seems to imply that you need to distribute your app via app store or testflight to be able to receive crash reports.
the majority of apps installed on my mac are not installed via app store, though many of them have app store variants.
i don’t know if the distribution channel matters or just having the app in app store is enough.
this article however also explicitly states this, so it appears that you do indeed by default not send this data to app developers:
users who download your app from the App Store will need to agree to share crash and usage data with developers.
I’m pretty sure this only goes to Apple, not to the actual developer.
I believe I’ve even seen devs specifically ask for copies of the reports from the crash reporter, as they wouldn’t receive them otherwise.
this doesn’t change the rest of your statement though, just afaik the recipient is different.
I like having TLS in my browser