![](https://lemmy.megumin.org/pictrs/image/7daaa788-d23b-4daa-bc37-5944c3d542af.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
Buy a keyboard and monitor
Buy a keyboard and monitor
Parts of “Rift of the Necrodancer”
And the only thing even worse than SCRUM is literally every other option
“Discord said users will be able to turn off the ads in their settings.”
What this shows is how terrible raw JS is, when all of this crap is required to fix all of the edge cases and make things actually work the way it’s supposed to.
Oddsparks
Dyson Sphere Program
If you get ghosted, it only proves that that person is emotionally immature and wasn’t ready for a relationship anyway, so they did you a favor by outing themself.
This is not useful now, nor will something like this ever be useful.
Some games don’t even have fucking KEYBINDS, which the most basic of accessibility features.
This will only change when stores (like Steam) start cataloguing these types of features and letting people setup default filters to hide all games without them.
The users have to make them hear that releasing any game without basic accessibility options is unacceptable. This will only happen when the majority is pushing for it, not just those that need the options.
Until then, make sure you leave a negative review and get a refund when you see this kind of thing, even if the game is otherwise good. Pirate the game instead if you still want to play it anyway. They have to be told that this is unacceptable.
The damage was not the actual pricing (which was cheaper than Unreal), the reason people are going to leave for Unreal/Godot and never come back is the loss of trust. Nobody wants to be chained down to a company that’s willing to pull the rug out like this.
Except Unreal already had the same kind of pricing structure that Unity is trying to move towards, that’s why Unity thought they could get away with it.
If you think they had impenetrable security before this, I’ve got some bad news for you…
Vanillaware in a nutshell
Any time a gaming company does something stupid, leave it to gamers to out-stupid the company and prove that they deserved to get shit on in the first place
Vivaldi will never have it
No, it’s not in Vivaldi
Vivaldi doesn’t (and won’t) have it.
And as soon as they have any competitors we might consider it
Of course they can. Everyone knows that password managers exist.
If you’re branching logic due to the existence or non-existence of a field rather than the value of a field (or treating undefined different from null), I’m going to say you’re the one doing something wrong, not the Java dev.
These two things SHOULD be treated the same by anybody in most cases, with the possible exception of rejecting the later due to schema mismatch (i.e. when a “name” field should never be defined, regardless of the value).