ikt

Why post a misleading graphic?

As the article says: No platform pays a flat rate per play. Each service splits a revenue pool by every artist’s share of total streams.

It’s not a flat get X plays earn Y amount, because as the amount of streams you get increases your share of the pool goes up which increases the amount you earn

In addition free loaders (people who have ad supported spotify for example) have a significantly lower pay per play than premium subscribers, and even then a premium subscriber in India for example has a lower pay per play rate than someone in Australia or Canada

deleted by creator

Ubuntu 7.04 -> 7.10 -> 8.04 -> 8.10 -> 9.04 -> 9.10 -> 10.04 -> 12.04 -> 14.04 -> 16.04 -> 18.04 -> 20.04 -> 22.04 -> 24.04 -> Fedora J/K Ubuntu 26.04

I like how sh.itjust.works

.

I’ve always said do the best you can to move away from big tech, this person saying:

If there’s a thriving secondhand market, more people can sell them and buy flagships.

If we’re down to worrying about the health of the secondhand market I think we’d be in an amazing place, but we’re not, every little bit helps and I think grabbing a second hand phone and installing graphene on it is a great idea

I’ve also heard they’re teaming up with Motorola:

https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/03/02/motorola-partners-with-grapheneos-for-future-phones/5160849

Bro, several users have taken to the Firefox subreddit, this is definitely worthy of being the most upvoted post on Lemmy rn

lmao so true