jerb

This is still fully possible on Immutable distros (which is why the name is misleading, but unfortunately is what stuck- “image-based” is a better description) and uBlue has a mechanism for it- since they’re delivered using OCI containers, it’s trivial to fork or derive from the project and add, remove or tweak whatever you need. There’s also BlueBuild which is YAML but that’s a third party project.

Can personally confirm that the OnePlus Watch 2 is fully vendor agnostic.

Wasn’t aware they were integrating docker-compose, that’s the perfect solution. I got so fed up with TrueCharts that I’ve been considering nuking my NAS and reinstalling OMV or something similar, but I guess I’ll wait it out and see what happens.

Seconding this. TrueCharts has been an absolute pain and I would not wish it on my worst enemy.

Just the kernel module, which still interacts with the proprietary driver.

That app just looks like reskinned KDE Connect.

That might be it- my screen is configured to turn on when tilted up, too. I’ll try that out.

How are you getting multiple weeks? Mine barely lasts a few days.

https://github.com/htrefil/rkvm

Not particularly, the workflow on your Arch system will be the same as any other distro, that’s the nice thing about Distrobox.

I would highly recommend looking into the distrobox-assemble command, though: it lets you declaratively build distroboxes with the packages and config you need on them. I have a personal box which operates as my primary terminal that’s automatically destroyed and recreated on every boot. This way, the packages I always use in a terminal are available, and I can add something I need temporarily with no issue without worrying about forgetting about that package being there down the line and causing some weird update failure or general bloat.

It does take some adjusting- the pitfalls you’d encounter with Distrobox on Universal Blue are the same as Distrobox on any other distro, so first I’d say to try moving your workflow to Flatpak and Distrobox on your current system or a VM and see how it works out. Generally Flatpak is preferred to a rootless Distrobox which is preferred to a rootful one, but sometimes there’s not a Flatpak for something (especially command line tools) and you need access to hardware or system level stuff that only a rootful one can do properly.

I think there’s still value in it from being a DE-agnostic GUI solution, for what it’s worth.