• 1 Post
  • 173 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle



  • Blitzing into largely undefended territories and nabbing large amounts of territory is kind of the easy part. As anyone who plays any sort of RTS, the key question is how you set up defenses and maintain logistics to thwart counter-offensives. The good news is that Ukraine has options. They can choose to dig in before Russia amasses troops to attack and legitimately try to hold onto the territory, or they can simply back out and use this as a skirmish to divide Russian forces before launching another offensive elsewhere.

    This seems to a) be intended to divide Russian attention and spread their forces out, b) be used in negotiation and applying domestic pressure to Putin, and c) provide a greater buffer for air-defense to counter inbound artillery and missiles. Who knows for sure though.



  • Well hey, good news, Boat Ho — we can do both! We have this magical capacity to both walk and chew bubble-gum at the same time. You may understand as as “not being mutually-exclusive.” Being the richest nation on Earth, this is not outside our capacity.

    Here let me help you out, here: You see, it’s not Ukraine preventing you from having those things; to the contrary, it’s not even a matter of affordability. The problem comes from Republican obstructionists.




  • lol ah yes, we should simply cede to a dictator’s territorial imperial annexation by… Weakening defense budgets? Remind me how the US annexed Iraq and Afghanistan as Russia did with Crimea, parts of Georgia, Chechyna?

    And no, NATO is how you invert the course. Russia is too pussy to confront NATO’s Article 5. So bring Ukraine into NATO.

    So why don’t you go tell Putin to cut his military budget?

    This guy… Apparently thinks we should have rolled over when Hitler invaded Poland and the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

    Edit: Observe below how this user hops around with tangential points and half-truths, all the while avoiding the heart of the matter: They believe we should just give in to the dictator — whether it’s the Hitler of old or the Putin of recent. Further observe how they have no response to the fact that NATO countries have never been directly attacked by Russia, giving proof to the power of a Defensive Alliance.


  • Fucking love this. Think about it:

    • While Russia concentrates defenses in the southern Donetsk region, Ukraine simply pushes forward into Russia itself and grabs easy land. Like squeezing a balloon, the bulge finds the least resistance.

    • It causes domestic unrest and panic.

    • It forces Russia to spread thinner their already-thin resources.

    • It gives Ukraine a bargaining-chip at the negotiating table.

    • It helps nullify net-territorial gains made by Russia elsewhere.

    • It gives Ukrainian forces a boost of morale.








  • The way I see the current administration’s policy is this:

    • Obviously we’ve had longstanding defense agreements with Israel.
    • Obviously APAIC is an incredibly strong lobbyist
    • It’s dangerous to get ahead of polls and walk back defending Israel following October 7th
    • Especially when the Jewish-American electorate is every bit as vital to getting Democrats over the finish-line.
    • Now imagine if you will that Biden withdraws all aid to Israel, but then Bibi in a false-flag just so happens to say oopsies again and ignores intelligence and let’s another terrorist attack happen on Israeli soil. Democrats would lose in a landslide.

    I think ultimately a lot of the optics right now is framed around getting reelected and ensuring Trump, who would be far more pro-genocide, doesn’t get in the White House. Blinken is clearly echoing marching orders from Biden in that respect.

    Do I believe this administration at this point wants anything to do with Bibi in reality? Not really.