I agree. Consider this situation:

“In one case known to +972 Magazine, an Iranian missile hit its target while fragments struck a nearby educational facility. Yet the media was only allowed to report on the latter, without being able to even mention the former or inspect the damage.”

This results in inaccurate reporting. The facts are distorted to make it seem that a school was the intended target, when in fact it was not.

IMO, the balance is lost to censorship.

An important distinction lol

Home Alone and The Santa Clause for the kids. Love Actually for the parents.

True, which is why this framework is doomed for failure:

“…participation in education, training or the labour market” is not required to receive UBI, and that funding for other social services are not cut.”

Other services must be cut to finance this. Pretending otherwise provides ammo to the nay-sayers.