I can paint as many nude images of Rihanna as I want.
I can paint as many nude images of Rihanna as I want.
Pictures. Memes. Anarchy.
There’s a few ways communities have signaled that the rules don’t require a thesis for every post.
I think Andor and What We Do In The Shadows are both interesting because sometimes the internicine wars are more brutal and interesting than the disagreements in our popular consciousness. It’s really easy to hate someone so similar to you.
Also the stakes are high when you are the minority and need each other to unite in order anything to get done. It really highlights the differences between ideology, whether they had been previously named or not.
Look at all the people who left the Trump administration and no longer support him. Or how big the hatred for Clinton is in many progressive/left circles. Look at all the religious people who wanted abortion to be banned but now realize they actually disagreed with the fetal life philosophy all along and didn’t realize it.
Yeah rebels VS empire is cool. Rebels VS rebels is actually way more interesting.
I don’t really recall that being the case. I do recall people agreeing that using the plausibility of a lab leak to just make COVID an anti China crusade was stupid and bad and in some cases racist.
Elaborate?
OK but this is why people give a shit when a CEO is cagey about how their magic box works
Not on my bingo sheet, but as China continues to exert more and more influence over HK as well as Africa/ME/South Asia, I guess it makes sense.
Yep here you go. It’s currently a very famous lawsuit.
That’s one example, plus I’m talking generally why this is an important question for a CEO to answer and why people think generally LLMs may infringe on copyright, be bad for creative people
The issue is that the LLMs do often just verbatim spit out things they plagiarized form other sources. The deeper issue is that even if/when they stop that from happening, the technology is clearly going to make most people agree our current copyright laws are insufficient for the times.
The idea behind regulations is to try to align the choice as closely at possibly. I’m not holding my breath tho
I’m talking specifically about the double taxation point.
Its clear inheritance taxes must be highly progressive or else you are penalizing things like family homes etc. But even still reverse mortgages, business loans, stocks… All these financial instruments exist.
double taxation
That one always kills me because from the viewpoint of the one inheriting the money, the money hasn’t been taxed yet. If you were to treat it like income from a lottery, everyone would agree that taxing it makes sense.
Just pop a bike rack on your back plates and you are good to go.
That’s not what non sequitir means
The easiest way to imagine how cylinders have different surface area for a given volume, is imagine how closely a shape matches a sphere, it should have a lower surface area.
Imagine a soda can with the width of one water molecule. The cross section of that can would be on the order of four aluminum atoms for that hair thin can. Then imagine a can that’s nearly a cube or a sphere and how all the liquid can be hiding behind other liquid atoms: hence fewer can atoms per liquid volume.
Blood vessels have high surface area. A pint of blood has low.
“Oh well” supposes we are in “not that bad” territory whereas the sheer size of India means 180 million people are on track for continuing marginalization. It’s not a non sequitir, perhaps irrelevant comparison, but if anyone like me wondered “well how many Muslims live in India?” the answer is a lot of them.
Oh well? I mean there’s more Muslims in India than men in the US. There’s more Muslims in India than people in Bangladesh. There’s more Muslims in India than the UK, France and Italy combined populations.
Is that Shin Hati?