This is a TIL so maybe they are surprised about the 7 that they listed and not the others.

They specifically said that a gross tenant paying market rate is better than no tenant.

Would you not consider an author who sold millions of books worldwide to be qualification enough for world news?

As a non American I wouldn’t mind articles about American authors in world news. It would have to be those with a high international profile though which gives the problem about where the line is.

They didn’t say that it wouldn’t compete. They said that it wouldn’t compete on price.

Don’t forget the sports washing angle with golf, football, boxing and motorsport.

I had a terrible first play through.

I read an article on this a while ago and I’m not sure what UK crimes he is known to have committed.

Our age of consent is 16 so he didn’t sexually assault a minor. If he did what he did then in the present day then he’d have broken sex trafficking laws but those laws were weak or non existent at the time.

Obviously, there’s a fair chance that he did commit a crime that we don’t know about and finding out about that would be made very difficult due to who he is.

I think this is much, *much* harder to pin down than you seem to be implying.

I agree which is what my last paragraph said. It might seem easy to pin down for a very small number of topics but not for most.

I also have mixed feelings about it but come out on the side of this is bad.

I feel like this measure begs the question: Should everyday people be allowed to sway public opinion?

They should be able to sway public opinion on things that are a matter of opinion, not on things that are proven facts.

I’m specifically thinking of anti-vaxxers here. The US is currently suffering from its largest measles outbreak since 1992 when the disease was declared eliminated in 2000. We shouldn’t be having this problem and it’s caused by people sharing opinions that contradict with scientifically proven facts.

The reason that I come out on the side of the law being bad is that the line between things that should require a degree to talk about and things that shouldn’t isn’t an easily defined one so the law is very open to abuse.

Not that this isn’t a valid concern but it seems like something that the oil companies would push as this isn’t a valid comparison.

It’s trying to get you to think about how livestock emissions compares to fossil fuel emissions while omitting 80 or 90% of fossil fuel emissions.

They don’t rely on the server to sound an already scheduled alarm but they do rely on the server to set the next one for a repeating alarm.

I think that it’s more so that he can say that he ended another war.

He kept the Prince title. I don’t think that one can be removed because it’s simply defined as the son of a monarch.

They could probably request that he stops using it but I don’t think it can be removed.

Yeah. It used to be done discreetly by the CIA but Trump is trying to cut costs.

I’m sure that the concept of “us” and “them” outdates the concept of countries.

If we got rid of countries then the people over that hill or across that river would become “them”.

Well, it probably is pretty normal. Not right, but not exceptional unfortunately.

Until 5sec after the last hostage is released, upon which the Israeli Nazis will continue the genocide.

Which would obviously be Hamas’s fault somehow.

You don’t for the one time codes because there is a standard that is supported by many authenticator apps.

App based 2FA is better. Either the app generates a time based code that you enter into the site or the site sends a push notification to the app asking you to verify the login attempt.

Passkeys are good too as they replace the password completely and leave the 2FA part to the device.

It’s better than nothing and some people would really struggle to do other types of 2FA.