Sounds like the Sirius cybernetics corporation:
The fundamental design flaws are obscured by the superficial design flaws.
Sounds like the Sirius cybernetics corporation:
The fundamental design flaws are obscured by the superficial design flaws.
and then:
I ScRoLlEd ThIs FaR fOr SpOnGeBoB cAsE
Sounds like this
Just barely good enough is perfect.
Machines are for breaking & plans are for changing.
You can drive the schedule or the budget - not both.
No ‘and then’
…
Disagree but upvoting because I’m sure this is true for some.
Fax it back to them.
The level of discussion in this thread is so refreshing to see.
I’m so tired of seeing people just shouting at each other. That and the bots.
Also whether non-smart versions will remain an option.
That will never…
…oh no.
No source to hand but I heard a rumour that:
This is first generation since 100 years ago that is worse off (in terms of health outcomes & ability to save) than their parents. I’m not so sure about wealth inequality but that’s pretty high in many countries right now.
Its interesting that it happens at times of fast technological change.
Edit: I agree about things being better than 100 years ago.
I imagine a similar reaction to this:
This thread went downhill fast. ffs can’t we all just get along.
Not really applicable here: Schadenfraudacious
The squits. You don’t want to be a squitter
You should have left it.
It sounds more threatening & my reply makes more sense. It was a good typo.
I’m imagining them logging your call then saying 7 years from the last record. If they follow up internally a couple weeks later, when you call back 7 years later they can repeat the process.
I’m feeling cynical today.