• 3 Posts
  • 235 Comments
Joined 8 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2024年9月14日

help-circle




  • I think it’s good that you’re trying to back your claims by sources / papers but your response tells me that you’re not trained (yet) in reading papers critically. Those are just some random question that came up from the top of my head and that any scientist would ask if someone were to present the findings of this study at a conference. This kind of rigor, to not blindly accept results but to critically evaluate them and poke holes in the arguments is what makes academia academia. I’m kind of surprised that you throw around papers and then get offended if people don’t blindly accept whatever you say, it’s kind of an interesting appeal to authority fallacy.



  • I can’t be bothered to read the paper, but here are some evergreens that make this result hard to interpret:

    • The sample includes women from all ages and boomer Karens would not report abuse
    • On the other hand, being bi or lesbian has only been accepted by society since the last 10-20 years. Don’t believe me? Just watch some 90s sitcom like Friends.
    • Being bi or lesbian still comes together with a special type of discrimination that a straight woman most likely will never experience; hence, straight women are potentially less sensitized to abuse / might have a different bar for what they consider abuse
    • Putting together these very different groups of people with very different experiences on what is “normal” will result in them having a very different sensitivity towards what they would consider abuse
    • In other words a young, bi/lesbian woman is probably more likely to report abuse than an old straight woman, an old lesbian woman who is just happy might never engage with researchers because of the past societal stigma that makes her keep her life private

    Of course we don’t know any of that, but these psychological studies are difficult to conduct because in theory you’d have to account for these effects and in practice that might be impossible. But again, I haven’t bothered to read the whole thing just to prove a point.










  • shaserlark@sh.itjust.workstoWorld News@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 天前

    Nice deflection. Classic “blame the voter” propaganda. You’re using a false dilemma to avoid addressing the actual issue: Dems actively funded and supported the genocide despite massive protests from their base.

    Trump being bad doesn’t absolve Harris/Dems of responsibility for their own actions. Democratic leadership chose genocide over winning. They gambled that voters had no choice but to vote for them anyway. They lost that bet.

    And with this I’m out, no time for blue MAGA.



  • shaserlark@sh.itjust.workstoWorld News@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    24 天前

    Okay I’ll take the bait. Thought we’re done with this bullshit discussion.

    Maybe Kamala should have given a fuck about Palestinians. Why do you leave out the part where she showed the middle finger to her own voters whenever she could, same as Biden? People have been telling the dems for a year to support Palestine or lose their vote, but the dems were willing to lose the election over Palestine and they did. The democrats betrayed their voters, not the other way around.