![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/541711e7-c07c-4a67-8cf2-d4c1bb91ecaf.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
all for cooperatives!
Just a humble squid that over produces slime. Buy my slime, its a medical wonder, cures halitosis, weird eye syndrome, bolding.
all for cooperatives!
Ive sat on my kindle pw3 on the plane, switch on to find its fucked. This just happened today 😥😥😥😥
well i say if we can go from feudalism to mercantilism to capitalism then why not capitalism to socialism to communism? its again distributing power from the top to the lower status classes, we saw similar in feudalism to mercantilism.
Wealth distribution is not equal under communism. Most is owned by the state, the privileged class still exists. The underprivileged class also exists.
Communism tends to be inefficient and less productive than capitalism, so a lot less is produced. This is demonstrated time and again. People just don’t have a personal motivation to increases production for the state. Distribution is also inefficient. Historically it leads to hunger because central planning is less effective than a decentralized system where individuals are able to make decisions.
So while I agree that the current level of wealth inequality is not good, communism is certainly not the solution. All it does is change where the lines of inequality are drawn. It usually kills a few million people for no good reason, too.
so your a reformist?
Depending entirely on the form of communism. Right now the worlds richest 400 have a combined wealth amounting near 7 trillion. In a communist society world wide we could distribute that wealth globally to install water infrastructure, food infrastructure, vaccinate everyone and still have change in the bank to support other large projects.
And this is speaking purely finance. Here in the UK we have more than enough empty home to house all of our homeless.
The amount we work to the resources produced are wildly high, we could work a lot less if not for the bosses ever demanding more.
They look like this ( . )( . )
Yes and it sounds pretty good to me, although I’d draw the line at pegging 🫠
Good question, and highly dependent. I think for the most part I’d move to being friends.
Lol I like the latter more
I’m a guy.
Question: on several intimate occasions with more than a few partners I have notice partners will cup my pecks…
It makes me feel self-conscious and would like to know why some of you cup pecks? 🫠
I’m a fan of tight boxers, a cross between pants and boxers. (Pants) in uk are underwear.
Trumps wearing nappies though.
I sleep weird, on my side, top leg extended forward parallel to my torso and bent at the knee, and bottom leg straight as to follow my torso. My foot of my top leg is often positioned touching the upper part of my bottom leg as to make a triangle.
In maintaining this position I find my manhood is free, in failing this I often cup.
Reason why: its uncomfortable to have my privates sticking to my legs, or squished between my legs
Also I sleep nude might help explain the weirdness.
That ceiling had me thinking the picture was abstract or disoriented
Put a stone in your boot 😉
The ir glasses / cap does work but isnt very concealed, best bet is face mask preferably a loose fitting snood and a peak hat or sun glasses with snood
Sadly there won’t be any learning, the security company will improve the tech and continue as usual.
This shit is here to stay :/
Looks like a fever dream to me
Sorry to report but this may make it worse
This misses the point of spec ops the line
Many people, even those who are non-assuming, find themselves on lists. People like myself, who hold leftist views that challenge the status quo, are often targeted for our political affiliations and organizing efforts. We are just people seeking dignity, but as we’ve seen with the CIA’s infiltration of the Black Panthers, BLM (the Alphabet Boys podcast does a great job covering the infiltration of BLM and the dangerous meddling), and Antifa, as well as agents within my own political party, it’s clear that surveillance is less about combating terrorism and more about breaking apart political movements.
While counterterrorism efforts have been successful in quashing actual terrorism, they are more often used to crack down on leftist movements. As revolutionary fervor rises in the future, we will likely see surveillance and infiltration used even more indiscriminately.
So to answer the question, surveillance is a safety net that allows the greedy minority to sleep soundly at night.